Page 19 of 30

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2024 10:35 am
by Abernathy
A copy of Anderson’s resignation letter has been released.

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2024 11:35 am
by Watchman
Sorry, but I’m not falling for that blatant hoax; crayons are a lot thicker than that thin scrawl

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:34 pm
by Oboogie
We knew Lee's a mug already, but now he has one!

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2024 7:17 pm
by The Weeping Angel

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2024 7:31 pm
by satnav
Whilst he does look desperate I'm pretty sure that Sunak gave Braverman her job back after a bit of gentle begging.

Was Anderson ever replaced as deputy party chairman or have they got so many that he doesn't need replacing?

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2024 7:58 pm
by Abernathy
From Wiki :
When the Conservatives are in government, the officeholder is usually a member of the Cabinet holding a sinecure position such as Minister without Portfolio. Deputy or Vice Chairmen of the Conservative Party may also be appointed, with responsibility for specific aspects of the party. The Chairman of the Conservative Party is Richard Holden who has been in the role since 13 November 2023. The role of Deputy Chairman is currently held by four Members of Parliament, they are: Jack Lopresti, Nickie Aiken, Luke Hall and Matt Vickers. Positions of Vice Chairman are held by Saqib Bhatti (Business), Sara Britcliffe (Youth) and Alexander Stafford (Policy).
So the answer is no, they don’t really need 30p Lee. Arguably, he was doing a really piss-poor job as Vice Chair (being a thick cunt) anyway.

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2024 8:42 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
I bet he's depressingly popular with local associations though.

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2024 7:35 pm
by davidjay
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Wed Jan 24, 2024 8:42 pm I bet he's depressingly popular with local associations though.
I don't know. The golf club bores of the CAs tend to have little time for oiks, no matter how mind you, he's got a point.

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2024 7:47 pm
by satnav
When Roy Hattersley failed to turn up for Have I got News for you he was replaced by a tub of lard, perhaps the chairman of the Conservative Party could do the same the next time he meets with all the other deputy chairmen.

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 1:34 pm
by Crabcakes
Only for Lee, just have a steaming bucket of horse shit.

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2024 9:20 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Sustainable, if you ignore the fact that it takes "100 million years" to replace. Seems like it's more like 300 million years anyway.


Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2024 9:50 pm
by Bones McCoy
I've heard the argument that fungus has evolved since then.

They argue that Wood rots (these days), rather than laying down generous seams of fuel for future civilisations.

I don't know enough to tell whether this is correct or not.
But if true, it means and end to coal.

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2024 10:30 pm
by kreuzberger
The man is a pitiable simpleton. He has a role (and probably a badge) which was doled out at nothing more relevant to the price of fish than an Asda regional managers' LinkedIn shindig, somewhere along the A50.

The remains of his career are measured in weeks if not hours, and his demise will be a national turning point, albeit unnoticed and without ceremony. Although it is a struggle to see through the fog, the country is so much better than Lee Anderson.

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2024 11:45 pm
by davidjay
kreuzberger wrote: Tue Feb 06, 2024 10:30 pm The man is a pitiable simpleton. He has a role (and probably a badge) which was doled out at nothing more relevant to the price of fish than an Asda regional managers' LinkedIn shindig, somewhere along the A50.

The remains of his career are measured in weeks if not hours, and his demise will be a national turning point, albeit unnoticed and without ceremony. Although it is a struggle to see through the fog, the country is so much better than Lee Anderson.
And as a result of his five years in Parliament the cunt will never have to do a proper job again.

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2024 8:09 am
by Watchman
He’ll bully his way back onto the local district council

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2024 8:24 am
by Andy McDandy
My money's on him getting caught leaving a Travelodge just off the A1 in the company of a particularly cheap and unfussy sex worker.

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2024 10:03 pm
by Crabcakes
Bones McCoy wrote: Tue Feb 06, 2024 9:50 pm I've heard the argument that fungus has evolved since then.

They argue that Wood rots (these days), rather than laying down generous seams of fuel for future civilisations.

I don't know enough to tell whether this is correct or not.
But if true, it means and end to coal.
Yep, this is correct. The biome is different now, and you just wouldn’t get the same result. Similarly, we can’t just shove a load of dead animals underground and get a load of 4 star down the line.

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2024 11:40 pm
by davidjay
Crabcakes wrote: Thu Feb 08, 2024 10:03 pm
Bones McCoy wrote: Tue Feb 06, 2024 9:50 pm I've heard the argument that fungus has evolved since then.

They argue that Wood rots (these days), rather than laying down generous seams of fuel for future civilisations.

I don't know enough to tell whether this is correct or not.
But if true, it means and end to coal.
Yep, this is correct. The biome is different now, and you just wouldn’t get the same result. Similarly, we can’t just shove a load of dead animals underground and get a load of 4 star down the line.
But we do get fungus elected to Parliament.

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2024 3:05 pm
by Crabcakes
He’s been suspended. Expect a resignation in a toys-out-of-pram moment, or a defection, imminently.

Re: Lee Anderson

Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2024 3:34 pm
by Abernathy