Page 177 of 277

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2023 6:38 pm
by kreuzberger
Crabcakes wrote: Mon Nov 06, 2023 2:22 pm Coincidence?
Dunno. Let's see what they do when this coming week's rapist news is about to drop.

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2023 6:41 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Can someone explain to me why Dorries and Dowden (the Deputy PM) aren't being (metaphorically of course) chased down the street about this?

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2023 6:46 pm
by Youngian
Of course they do
More than seven in 10 Tory members want Nigel Farage to be readmitted to the party, a poll has revealed. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/p ... 42266.html

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2023 7:28 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Miriam Cates solves the birth rate issue.

Who are these people in public life saying it's really shit to have children? She says herself earlier in the the thread that the big majority of women want children.


Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2023 7:51 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Yep.


Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2023 10:14 pm
by Youngian
Last time I looked the planet wasn’t running out of people and I thought ‘Britain is full.’ We can take an educated guess as to what Cates and her mates lebensborn kinder programmes are really about.

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2023 10:27 pm
by Boiler
Cates: the ultimate breeder.

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 12:27 am
by Bones McCoy
Boiler wrote: Mon Nov 06, 2023 10:27 pm Cates: the ultimate breeder.
Be like Johnson.

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 5:21 am
by Youngian

She studied genetics at the University of Cambridge, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miriam_Cates

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 9:02 am
by Youngian
Priorities and tough decisions

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 10:36 am
by Tubby Isaacs
Brainbox Miriam has more.

The Princess of Wales would run a while from this.


Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 10:46 am
by Watchman
Maybe we could give a reward for breeding

The Cross of Honour of the German Mother (German: Ehrenkreuz der Deutschen Mutter), referred to colloquially as the Mutterehrenkreuz (Mother's Cross of Honour) or simply Mutterkreuz (Mother's Cross), was a state decoration conferred by the government of the German Reich

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 11:01 am
by Crabcakes
The most bizarre part of that being that the royals have never raised their own children. They’re barely present for a considerable part of their upbringing.

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 11:03 am
by Malcolm Armsteen
Somewhere in 'On War' Carl von Clausewitz (1780-1831), him who inspired Prussian and later Nazi military thinking, gives his plans increasing the population (big armies, innit?)

Because men's reproductive bits last longer than women's all soldierly men should marry a young woman whilst young and whelp as many pups as possible (come on lads, it's your duty, poke for Prussia). When the young woman hits her middle years, and is either dead or knackered from constant pregnancy, she is set aside to look after the bairns and he gets another go with a young maiden and gets her ständig schwanger. I think 15 years was mentioned.

Rinse and repeat if possible until senility or a well aimed musket ball ends the fun.

Can't give you a reference because I'm remembering this from first degree stuff and that's a long time ago now...

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 11:04 am
by Watchman
Crabcakes wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 11:01 am The most bizarre part of that being that the royals have never raised their own children. They’re barely present for a considerable part of their upbringing.
Like most “benefits scroungers”

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 11:19 am
by Andy McDandy
Like pretty much anything considered shameful in a poorer household. Big telly, no books, awful decor, drinking early in the day, no steady job, live on an estate....

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 11:37 am
by Malcolm Armsteen
The King's delivery making it amply clear what he thinks of the government's 'programme'...

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 12:44 pm
by Abernathy
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 11:37 am The King's delivery making it amply clear what he thinks of the government's 'programme'...
Indeed. He had the demeanour of Mr Sowerberry the undertaker conducting a stock take of his funeral urn inventory.

In other news, the latest government flunkey, appearing on The Daily Politics now, is somebody called Alex Burghardt, who is supposedly a Cabinet Office minister. Never heard of him before. but -quelle surprise - he is a total wanker. Where do they keep producing these turds from ?

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 12:59 pm
by Andy McDandy
Former think-wank minion of IDS, then an adviser to May. Safe south Essex seat, nothing particularly interesting about him. By Tory standards, positively harmless.

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 1:07 pm
by Youngian
Must be over 100 Tory MPs few of us have ever heard of.