:sunglasses: 17.5 % :pray: 12.4 % :laughing: 10.3 % 🧥 1 % :cry: 22.7 % :🤗 35.1 % :poo: 1 %
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#6741
kreuzberger wrote: Mon Jul 19, 2021 8:30 pm After today, which technically, has four or five more hours to coagulate, who else is going to dig me up for?
This country is a very bad place.
I'd accept 'in a bad place'.
Nigredo, Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By Cyclist
#6782
The WI have turned up at the hall for the first time in 17 months. There are over forty of them, average age around 70. Not a face mask among 'em. Ok, they'll all be double jabbed, but even so. I will be watching with interest over the coming weeks and months to see just how much protection screeching, wailing and groaning your way through Jerusalem provides against catching infectious killer diseases.

And this on the same day as the Methodist chapel across the road held a funeral for someone who died of Covid just a short while ago.

It's ok. They're obviously using their common sense. :roll:
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#6843
Apparently Macron didn't Tweet this, but it seems to reflect his thinking. I'm with him 100%.
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By kreuzberger
#6845
It's a tough one.

I recall having a fit of the illiberal vapours on here when those Muslim nutters were wreaking havoc, live on TV, across France. I soon rowed back from that one!

Broadly though, I am usually quite wary of the state, any state, introducing new blanket rules but this seems to me to be a matter of public health policy which cannot be derailed by the congenitally truculent. No one is talking about vaxxed-up hit squads coming in the dead of night. It is simply a matter of requiring all patrons to be as inoculated as each other so as to minimise the likelihood of death or serious illness.

Moreover, hepatitis B, meningococcus C, pneumococcus, measles, mumps, and rubella are mandatory for all children born in France. Again, a matter of public health policy.

The one caveat I would introduce is that, in the event of a poor reaction, the state should be firmly in the sling for compensation.

Politically, and with an election on the horizon, much will depend on Le Pen and her position which, says a penny to a quid, will be an opportunistic one intended to resonate with those gilets jaunes freaks and those who are banging on with their disgraceful Holocaust comparisons.
Dalem Lake liked this
By Oboogie
#6846
Other actions which risk the liberty and health of the public are proscribed, why shouldn't vaccine refusal? The first duty of government should always be the well being of it's citizens, that overrides all other considerations in my view. As the article says, the vaccines are the only weapon we have. People who choose to risk the health of others, should not be at liberty to do so.
  • 1
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 66
Trump 2.0 Lunacy

They're going from room to room collecting co[…]

Local Elections 2025

That's an advantage with some lower engageme[…]

Nargle Fargle

And Trump has proved that they can piss on their f[…]

The Gender Identity Issue.

This is completely wrong. It only talked about the[…]