Mailwatch(ed) Forum

Not Tits McGee then?

The chances of Nads showing up for this are pretty much zilch, I should think.

Johnson might be considering elevating the fragrant Nadine to the Lords:

Johnson’s plan to give peerages to two MPs could leave successor facing early byelections

Adams, who championed Johnson long before he became Tory leader, has already announced he is stepping down at the next election. As minister without portfolio in the cabinet office, he was at the heart of attempts to rescue Johnson’s premiership as it was falling apart earlier this month.

He has held his seat of Selby and Ainsty three times, each time with an increased majority. He won the seat by more than 20,000 votes at the last election. Labour is the challenger and a byelection could show Keir Starmer’s party is closing the gap. Dorries holds the seat of Mid Bedfordshire, with a 24,000 majority at the last election.

It comes with persistent rumours that Johnson is planning a major list of peerages, which is expected to include the former editor of the Daily Mail, Paul Dacre. Johnson had been determined to make Dacre the chair of broadcasting regulator Ofcom, but the appointment was opposed by an independent selection panel. Dacre subsequently pulled out of the process.

She’s just fucking trolling us now.

Nadine Dorries grants listed status to Cecil Rhodes plaque at Oxford college


https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2 ... rd-college

Nobody had heard of Oxford before Inspector Morse.

Not a fucking clue, you thick cow

Nadine Dorries criticised for sharing edited image of Sunak wielding knife

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-62369858

Ministers have criticised Nadine Dorries for sharing a doctored image of Rishi Sunak wielding a knife behind Boris Johnson's back.

The culture secretary retweeted an image of the PM depicted as Julius Caesar about to be stabbed in the back by Mr Sunak, in the role of Brutus.

Greg Hands said it was "dangerous", while Sir Robert Buckland said it was "not just incendiary - it's wrong".

An ally of Ms Dorries said it was "obviously a satirical image".

Shortly before sharing the picture that was posted by another account on Twitter, Ms Dorries also wrote that Mr Sunak had "stabbed Boris Johnson in the back".

What would Sir David Amess say?

That she is absolutely the worst kind of cunt that in the past would have had no place in the Conservative party but now is embraced by than other cunt.

^^ That.

Aaaand she's gone!

Off to the back benches to plot the return of the King Passing Water.

No. Just wrong.

Whoosh...



Heading to the Lords?

Rumour has it Nad has deleted her Twitter so it can’t be scrutinised and used to block her Lords appointment. Yet again showing how little she understands of media, given all those tweets will be archived elsewhere.

Still, will be worth the look on her face when someone pulls out copies of her tweets when she’s in front of a committee. She’ll probably think someone has invented a time machine

And with that total lack of self-awareness we've come to know and ridicule...

Former culture secretary Nadine Dorries has accused the government of "lurching to the right", as she warned the Tories were facing a "wipeout" at the next election if it did not change course

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-63158495.amp

I wonder who might have been one of the major culprits in this lurch to the right?

Nad takes exception to the only policies that aren’t lurching to the right

She accused the government of shelving several of his policies, including privatising Channel 4, reviewing the BBC's licence fee, introducing the Online Safety Bill

Legacy, something you can proclaim you achieved in your life, she now has the root sum of nothing.

I wonder what else will be lost amongst the chaos today.

Committee publishes Special Report on Rt Hon Nadine Dorries MP

https://committees.parliament.uk/commit ... orries-mp/

We are disappointed with Ms Dorries reluctance to engage with the Committee on this matter. Ms Dorries at first refused to reconsider her claims and her subsequent clarifications introduce more confusion than they resolve.

In the Committee she talks about meeting boys in a flat (which matches Channel 4’s investigation) who later turned out to be actors. Her clarification talks about a homeless young men section.
In the Committee she said that she saw a pharmacist who prepared food and who was also an actor. In her clarification, that pharmacist was the mother of one of the boys.
In the Committee she said that the parents of one of the boys contacted her and came to have lunch to tell her the boys were in acting school. In her clarification, the mother, who was also the pharmacist, arranged for her son to come to the House for a tour and lunch and it was he who told her about being an actor.

We do not find either the original claims, or the clarifications to be credible and have seen no corroboration of her claims that Channel 4 and Love Productions used actors in a reality television show. In contrast, the detailed investigation carried out by Channel 4 gives us confidence that her claims are groundless. We are concerned Ms Dorries appears to have taken an opportunity, under the protection of privilege, to traduce the reputation of Channel 4.

Had Ms Dorries remained Secretary of State, driving a policy of selling the channel, we may have sought a referral to the Privileges Committee but, as her claims have not inhibited the work of the Committee and she no longer has a position of power over the future of Channel 4, we are, instead, publishing this Report to enable the House, and its Members, to draw their own conclusions.