Page 16 of 35

Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2022 7:12 am
by Boiler
Sorry, what has Sarah Vile said and where?

Oh, how I miss Kobel's input on this matter... (not)

Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2022 4:11 pm
by mattomac

Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2022 8:12 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
More razor sharp analysis by Laura, who's never heard of the price cap or Ofgem. by the look of it. They can't "charge what they like" now, Laura.

Where would a nationalized energy company source its cheaper fuel? Bills could only be made much cheaper by the government subsidizing them. Guess what, we can do that now.


Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2022 8:30 pm
by Abernathy
Nationalisation, for the Trots, has taken on a new life well beyond simply being quite a good idea for certain service sector industries and utilities, to being the absolute knee-jerk, catch-all, article-of-faith answer to everything for the Trotskyist cult. It wouldn’t be stretching it to describe it as a rather ridiculous fetish.

Nationalisation isn’t a bad idea per se. It just isn’t the universal perfect answer to everything that the Trots think it is. :? :geek:

Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2022 9:26 pm
by Boiler
They can't really be harking back to the days of Citizen Clem, surely?

Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2022 10:14 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
It's populism. When you're stuck defending Jez foreign policy, you snatch hold of anything more popular.

Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2022 11:02 pm
by mattomac
Yeah when Reeves was announcing the Green fund I think last summer you got simple tweets from Beckett and the like you know what’s greener “nationalisation” and I was like how?

Of course this lot can never make the connection, to nationalise you need power, to gain power you need to compromise to compromise you need not to be such a dick.

Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 6:42 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Thanks for this genius, Jez fans. No wonder you think Sir Keir's a hopeless sell out if you get your information from sources like this. Sadly that's pretty much everyone BTL.

You pay tax on profits, in the UK and Norway. Your profits are calculated after expenses of doing business.

In Norway, the oil field is producing now, making profits. Hence the tax payment. In the UK, the field has stopped producing. When it was in the past, it paid tax. Now it isn't it gets tax back on the cost of decommissioning. Almost certainly exactly the same thing will happen in Norway when it's decommissioned.


Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 8:08 pm
by Boiler
Still sounds like she's a Viz character.

Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 8:34 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Old fave. War is Ukraine's fault.

This is "had the victim not gone out to a disco, and not got drunk on sambucas" stuff.

Extra down mark for not knowing what "ad hominem" is. It's no more ad hominem that Willamson's own post.


Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 10:58 am
by Crabcakes
Abernathy wrote: Thu Mar 31, 2022 8:30 pm
Nationalisation isn’t a bad idea per se. It just isn’t the universal perfect answer to everything that the Trots think it is. :? :geek:
I suspect it’s in part a mindset based in it being a start to something bigger. To hideously misquote Yoda, “Nationalisation leads to unions. Unions leads to strikes. Strikes lead to revolution

Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 11:34 am
by Boiler
Crabcakes wrote: Thu Apr 07, 2022 10:58 am “Nationalisation leads to unions. Unions leads to strikes. Strikes lead to the dead going unburied”
FTFY.

Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 12:13 pm
by Crabcakes
Dreams vs reality :lol:

Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:51 pm
by mattomac
Thankfully a few of these aren’t Labour MPs anymore.

Weirdly at the exact point Starmer was dismissing a revolution, I was reading about the Russian one.

Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 9:34 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
There was criticism of the Tory energy plan for being a bit of a slow burner on energy costs. So is nationalisation, if it works at all. Railtrack was a bad idea, and rightly renationalised by Blair, but I think costs rose initially. Where's Jez going to get cheaper oil and gas from too? And do you even need to nationalise the whole shooting match to do the other things he wants?

Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 10:41 pm
by Bones McCoy
Boiler wrote: Thu Apr 07, 2022 11:34 am
Crabcakes wrote: Thu Apr 07, 2022 10:58 am “Nationalisation leads to unions. Unions leads to strikes. Strikes lead to the dead going unburied”
FTFY.
As do poorly handled pandemics.

Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:43 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Jesus, Clive. You think this is like... what? Orban? Trump?


Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2022 5:20 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Ukraine besieging its own city as a false flag?


Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2022 12:36 am
by RedSparrows
I've not read or listened to Scott Ritter, but I saw some other useful idiot quoting him, some classic YouTuber contrarian who clearly thought everyone else was a total idiot before giving a badly thought out argument for why Russia is amazing in this war, thereby proving conclusively he was the idiot all along.

Re: Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2022 10:31 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Seeing I put Chris WIlliamson on here, I might as well put Hoey as well.