Page 134 of 275

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2023 7:02 pm
by Tubby Isaacs

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2023 9:23 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
How are Labour anti-nuclear?! And why wasn't this revival launched in the previous 13 years, one might ask?

If you scroll down it says they didn't commission any in the 13 years they were in power before the next 13 years when they weren't. This is pathetic stuff.


Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2023 12:59 am
by mattomac
Haven’t they basically stole Labour’s plans but they aren't even as good. I’m pretty sure they did commission some though.

Cameron and Clegg blocked its building saying it would take too long to build, would have come online about the time Putin kicked off on Ukraine. Hmmm

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2023 12:22 pm
by Yug
Thanks Ian.

@Tubby Isaacs please remember to add some context. Just because you know what you're talking about it doesn't follow that everyone else does. Especially in a thread about random Tories doing random stuff that jumps around from one subject to another.

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2023 12:54 pm
by Andy McDandy
Today's PMQ was the last before the summer recess. Usual shit, nothing particularly noteworthy save for Sunak going balls-deep on the 40 new hospitals claim, announcing even more, and coming across as if he'd had a pep talk from Gove.

That said, do the BBC know something we don't?
PM asked about video of Tory MP 'lauding' Taliban
Reform UK MP Mark Francois said his colleagues on the defence select committee were shocked by a recent video of their chairman and Tory MP, Tobias Ellwood, "lauding" the leadership of the Taliban after a recent visit to Afghanistan.

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2023 12:57 pm
by Bones McCoy
davidjay wrote: Wed Jul 19, 2023 12:42 pm At least she can't be accused of going for style over substance.
There's a photo that exudes "Want to speak to the manager".

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2023 12:59 pm
by Bones McCoy
Andy McDandy wrote: Wed Jul 19, 2023 12:54 pm Today's PMQ was the last before the summer recess. Usual shit, nothing particularly noteworthy save for Sunak going balls-deep on the 40 new hospitals claim, announcing even more, and coming across as if he'd had a pep talk from Gove.

That said, do the BBC know something we don't?
PM asked about video of Tory MP 'lauding' Taliban
Reform UK MP Mark Francois said his colleagues on the defence select committee were shocked by a recent video of their chairman and Tory MP, Tobias Ellwood, "lauding" the leadership of the Taliban after a recent visit to Afghanistan.
I expect a full retraction:
The BBC wishes to apologise for describing MP Mark Francois as "Reform UK".
Please disregard this.
We intended to describe him as "Inadequate cunt".

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2023 1:18 pm
by Andy McDandy
They've fixed it now. No apology though!

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2023 1:49 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Yug wrote: Wed Jul 19, 2023 12:22 pm Thanks Ian.

@Tubby Isaacs please remember to add some context. Just because you know what you're talking about it doesn't follow that everyone else does. Especially in a thread about random Tories doing random stuff that jumps around from one subject to another.
Fair point.
The London mayor election is probably due a thread of its own.

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2023 10:33 pm
by davidjay
I think they've given up.


Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2023 10:42 pm
by kreuzberger
He's just trying to get money out of people on the internet.

Old habits, aand all that.

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2023 10:51 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
This doesn't even work as a rhetorical quip, let alone an actual letter.

No wonder they see Nigel Farage's bank account as a big political opening.

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2023 7:01 am
by Youngian
davidjay wrote: Wed Jul 19, 2023 10:33 pm I think they've given up.

When a local UKIP branch put out this kind of amateurish twaddle, taxpayers weren’t footing their salary.

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2023 9:22 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
This looks sub-optimal.


Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2023 9:33 pm
by kreuzberger
The papers reporting a swizz to the tune of 140,000 GBP. Lemme guess; neither went to Eton or Millfield.

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2023 10:25 pm
by Killer Whale
More of this sort of corrupt shit to come when their wheeze to change PCC elections to first past the post comes to fruition.

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:37 am
by Philip Marlow
I know we're not supposed to use language like this - terribly uncouth what what - but these people are scum.


Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2023 5:16 pm
by Boiler
]I reposted that elsewhere.

The resident, oh-so-polite Tory apologist replied:

Screenshot 2023-07-25 at 17-15-58 The Trials and Tribulations of the Tory Party.png
Screenshot 2023-07-25 at 17-15-58 The Trials and Tribulations of the Tory Party.png (13.74 KiB) Viewed 7127 times
Followed by

Screenshot 2023-07-25 at 17-19-28 The Trials and Tribulations of the Tory Party.png
Screenshot 2023-07-25 at 17-19-28 The Trials and Tribulations of the Tory Party.png (2.72 KiB) Viewed 7122 times

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2023 10:00 am
by Crabcakes
Interesting article on one town’s plan to get round FPTP and remove the Tories for the first time in nearly a century. I hope it works, and is picked up elsewhere.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... SApp_Other

Re: Conservatives Generally

Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2023 11:14 am
by RedSparrows
Boiler wrote: Tue Jul 25, 2023 5:16 pm ]I reposted that elsewhere.

The resident, oh-so-polite Tory apologist replied:


Screenshot 2023-07-25 at 17-15-58 The Trials and Tribulations of the Tory Party.png

Followed by


Screenshot 2023-07-25 at 17-19-28 The Trials and Tribulations of the Tory Party.png
This is all true, to a point, Lord Copper.

The thing is: people being safe where they live is quite a different case to, oh, say, 'do we send a navy after a submersible of people looking for a shipwreck, entirely voluntarily?'

And so on. It's weasly to hide behind the logic alone.