Mailwatch(ed) Forum

And still his followers praise him as the little man being done down by the establishment. None of them will stop to think how he was able to get a Coutt's account in the first place.

safe_timber_man wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 9:32 pm

And he knows full well a bank can't publicly discuss an individuals account. He's really playing up to the audience. The man has fallen so far over the years in my book.

Indeed, there's only one person that can come out clearly and say what bank it was, and that is Farage himself making public the notification that his account is being closed. Otherwise it's Trumpian style grifting/bollocks by default.

If it is Coutts/RBS then they have no idea of the world of pain that is about to confront them.

Yeah, I bet they're quaking. Bank's don't mess with accounts unless there's a suspicion of dodgy stuff or sanctions have been imposed. And let's face it, although Farage has been a massive boil on the arse of British politics for about 20 years, he is actually small fry on the grand scheme of things so why would a bank who probably has accounts with absolute billionaires waste their time and energy on him unless they had to.

Aye, Farage's Financials is a mildly amusing sitcom until we consider why no bank in the country will touch him. That's not very funny at all.

Dalem Lake wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 6:57 am

If it is Coutts/RBS then they have no idea of the world of pain that is about to confront them.

Yeah, I bet they're quaking. Bank's don't mess with accounts unless there's a suspicion of dodgy stuff or sanctions have been imposed. And let's face it, although Farage has been a massive boil on the arse of British politics for about 20 years, he is actually small fry on the grand scheme of things so why would a bank who probably has accounts with absolute billionaires waste their time and energy on him unless they had to.

And yet boycotting Mail/GBeebies advertisers is cancel culture.

All the Red Wallers threatening to boycott Coutts.

Coutts remain tight lipped about impact on their Wakefield branch.

And the Mail's commentariat know that this is the Rothschild's move for world government.

In his television statement he claimed to have held the account since 1980.
Nigel is 59, so would have been 16 years old in 1980.

Now many 16 year old "Boys of the people" have the funds to open a Coutts account?

Maybe their terms and conditions have changed over the years, or it was opened by his parents? I remember Barclays used to give you static if your current account fell below £100 in the 80s.

Farage can name Coutts (you see what I did there?) and the other 6 banks, if he wants to, and release every correspondence he's had with them.

I'm no expert on money laundering rules, but I'd be surprised if the rules didn't say basically "You need to stop the accounts, and you don't have to say why".

Ha ha ha ha. This account is always a hoot.

Bones McCoy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:08 am All the Red Wallers threatening to boycott Coutts.

Coutts remain tight lipped about impact on their Wakefield branch.

World of pain, apparently.

What the fuck has happened to Andrew Neill.

He's supposed to be a big sensible boy, not a tinfoil hatter herder.
Is he angling to get his GB News show back?

He's always been like this. Though he's smart enough to have reined it in when he was working for the BBC.

Eh? He was the editor of the Sunday Times with a circulation of 1.6 million and an Insight Team which vied with Panorama for the accolade as being the finest in the land.

Now, he is crawling up Farage's fundament from his bolt-hole in the south of France. The man is a toilet.

Jesus, the snowball has started and this is going to get so tedious and fact free:


EXCLUSIVE: Major British building society admits it IS closing accounts of people who 'are rude or discriminate' amid uproar as banks are accused of dumping customers including Nigel Farage over their views on Brexit and LGBT issues

Talk about being being misleading.

We would only make the difficult decision to close a savings account if a customer is rude, abusive, violent or discriminates in any way, based on the specific facts and behaviour in each case.'

" Rude, abusive, violent or discriminates" - I may be wrong but I'd have thought what they're referring to here is being rude or discriminate to staff at the bank?

But anyway, all a load of bollocks obviously but the generic statement from this bank is quite easy to manipulate to create a disingenuous headline for thickos to get angry about and not bother reading any further.

If they did, and had half a brain, they'd have made it this far into the article and realise it's all a load of shite:

Yorkshire Building Society today declined to comment on the case but a spokesman said: 'We do not close savings accounts based on different opinions regarding beliefs.

If the Blob/NWO/WEF/ZOG/RSPCA wanted to silence Nargle it would be a lot easier to arrange an 'accident' than close his bank account.

Leave the UK (Where's Sgt Maj Shut-Up).

I hear Minsk welcomes washed up mercenary leaders.

davidjay wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 11:13 pm If the Blob/NWO/WEF/ZOG/RSPCA wanted to silence Nargle it would be a lot easier to arrange an 'accident' than close his bank account.

That plan backfired.
Soros couldn't hire a big enough conference centre to accommodate them all.

kreuzberger wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:45 pm Eh? He was the editor of the Sunday Times with a circulation of 1.6 million and an Insight Team which vied with Panorama for the accolade as being the finest in the land.

Now, he is crawling up Farage's fundament from his bolt-hole in the south of France. The man is a toilet.

Yeah, but he also bought the fake Goebbels diaries and had David Irving verify them.