Page 12 of 52
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2022 5:33 pm
by Yug
Sky News have started doing this. I don't normally pay much attention to the telly, but twice this week when I got to work around seven o'clock the Kay Burley show has had Pat McFadden and Rachel Reeves instead of the usual Tory twat of the day. I can only hope that other channels follow suit.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2022 10:42 am
by Samanfur
Thread. I wish I was shocked:
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 12:56 pm
by Crabcakes
Yug wrote: ↑Sat Nov 26, 2022 5:33 pm
Sky News have started doing this. I don't normally pay much attention to the telly, but twice this week when I got to work around seven o'clock the Kay Burley show has had Pat McFadden and Rachel Reeves instead of the usual Tory twat of the day. I can only hope that other channels follow suit.
I think this is a huge unforced error by Sunak. Did he really think tv news would just have dead air? And did he not notice how huffily ignoring the media worked out for Jezza?
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 12:59 pm
by Andy McDandy
I am a busy man with big plans, who cannot afford to be at the mercy of the capricious and short term obsessed media.
He is a rude berk who doesn't understand how this stuff works.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2022 12:35 am
by mattomac
By not appearing to be around his approval ratings have slightly improved.
It’s a hard one to work in the long term.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 6:19 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 4:37 pm
by kreuzberger
I do get why the courts have green lit Braverman's Rwanda wheeze, the question being whether it is legal or not.
Fair enough, it is legal. Somewhat more long-windedly; no parliamentarian, ever since law became A Thing felt compelled to table a bill outlawing the forcible deportation of innocent people.
Yes, crims were deported in days of yore but that was booted off the statute in the Victorian era. For fuck's fucking sake, this is abhorrent.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 6:51 pm
by davidjay
kreuzberger wrote: ↑Tue Dec 20, 2022 4:37 pm
I do get why the courts have green lit Braverman's Rwanda wheeze, the question being whether it is legal or not.
Fair enough, it is legal. Somewhat more long-windedly; no parliamentarian, ever since law became A Thing felt compelled to table a bill outlawing the forcible deportation of innocent people.
Yes, crims were deported in days of yore but that was booted off the statute in the Victorian era. For fuck's fucking sake, this is abhorrent.
It does make you wonder whether deporting criminals to some Guantanamo-like enclave in a country faraway might be on their agenda.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 7:06 pm
by Andy McDandy
As said before, in their utopia nobody has rights, just privileges. And those have to be earned, inherited, or gifted.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 9:01 pm
by Abernathy
As it is almost Christmas, I’d just like to send this seasonal message to Ms. Braverman :
I hope your next shite’s a hedgehog, Cruella. .
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2023 7:45 pm
by Watchman
Looks like she’s feeling left out
Suella Braverman plans to ditch key Windrush pledges
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... SApp_Other
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2023 7:52 pm
by kreuzberger
Sack the nurses, jail the teachers, bash the PoC - not destroying Channel 4 looks to have been the highlight of the week.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 11:25 am
by davidjay
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 11:35 am
by Malcolm Armsteen
Straight from the National Socialist playbook.
How has this country come to this?*
*Rhetorical question.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 12:20 pm
by Abernathy
Here is the new Spitting Image puppet of Suella Braverman. I don't think it looks quite evil enough.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 12:50 pm
by davidjay
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Sat Jan 14, 2023 11:35 am
Straight from the National Socialist playbook.
How has this country come to this?*
*Rhetorical question.
A few years ago I wondered how far along from 1933 a survivor from the Nazis would think we'd travelled if they looked at a Daily Mail headline. Now the same things are being said by the Home Secretary. I don't think it's hyperbolic now to wonder where it will end.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 2:58 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
I agree.
See also 'The Truth - where has it gone?'
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 3:05 pm
by davidjay
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Sat Jan 14, 2023 2:58 pm
I agree.
See also 'The Truth - where has it gone?'
"Fake news" and "Boris being Boris" had a lot to do with it.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 7:10 pm
by kreuzberger
It is on said by Freedom from Torture on Twitter that the Home Office has requested that they take down the damning evidence of their boss being a relentlessly unpleasant individual.
"Erm, go fuck yersels", or words to that effect, was the answer.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 8:51 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Wait - that's the official Home Office account, making comments on a political story from a political event.
That's not allowed. Breach of ministerial code and that.
Also- reads very much like the work of 55 Tufty.
Whatever happened to the neutral civil service*
*Don't tell me, I know...