Mailwatch(ed) Forum

Abernathy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2024 12:27 pm Braga Braga Braga

Brugger. And I checked that a brillion times brefore I posted.

Looks like Arbers really towned you, Keuzie.

.

So she says, "Visit me in Springfield and eat my pussy"..

The Daily Mail of NYC.

That's not quite stealing dogs and eating them, is it?

"Smashes into" - no, the 'mom' drove into the Haitian's car, and it did very little damage.

Pretty vile propaganda.

Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2024 2:26 pm "Smashes into" - no, the 'mom' drove into the Haitian's car, and it did very little damage.

Pretty vile propaganda.

Won't somebody think of the weaponsied autistic daughters?

Reply of the Day.

Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2024 2:26 pm "Smashes into" - no, the 'mom' drove into the Haitian's car, and it did very little damage.

Pretty vile propaganda.

you try and stop a big truck like this — there’s no way,” she added

Seems like the darkie wasn't the one doing the "smashing".

As I observed with a few of our East Ren school-run mums.
If you can't control it, or see out of it, get something smaller.

https://bsky.app/profile/phillewis.bsky ... 74ltvfj524

Phil Lewis
‪@phillewis.bsky.social‬
JD Vance attempts to justify spreading lies about Haitians eating pets in Springfield, Ohio:

“If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people then that's what I'm going to do”

Fucking hell...

‘I’m a lying bastard but, y’know, for good.’

Given that, in order to win, he needs to bring voters to him that are not already a part of his dedicated cult/core following, Trump is surely not going about it in any credible way. The man is so very, very clearly utterly deranged. I also think Kamala’s campaign has recognised this and will be playing him like a hooked trout all the way to 5 November. Very encouraging.

Somehow I don’t think it’s the sort of attention he was quite looking for

After the first debate Trump tried to use a boxing analogy claiming that only losers demand a rematch. But this is clearly not the case. Boxers who usually demand a rematch are boxers who lose close fights (they were expected win) on a split decisions. A boxer who gets hammered in a fight will seldom demand a rematch with their opponent.

Personally I'm not that surprised that a bunch of misogynontisc online men in their 20s would find the far-right appealing.

Y’all may like this :