Mailwatch(ed) Forum

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... armer.html

I was half expecting "why it's the right of every free-born Briton to have a fag", but instead he goes with the Thatcher portrait. It's pretty much what you'd expect, and my word, the bitterness and personal hatred are visible from Pluto.

I tried to read it, but they wanted £1.99 a month from me., and there's no fucking chance of that.

Thatcher was brilliant, everyone loved her, British people are naturally Tories, Starmer is a snake, lied to everyone to get into power, dodgy friends, just let's anyone into Downing Street who's lent him a few quid, fucked an American stripper while his wife was getting cancer treatment and misused public funds, oh sorry, not that bit...

Abernathy wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 11:15 am I tried to read it, but they wanted £1.99 a month from me., and there's no fucking chance of that.

It was 99p last month, that was nearly low enough to tempt me.

Like Starmer, one of the first things Thatcher did was agree to meet some expensive public sector pay claims. Callaghan had set up a commission under Hugh Clegg as a way of resolving the issues that led to the so-called Winter of Discontent. It's true that the Tories had agreed to accept Clegg in the campaign whereas Starmer had only said he'd settle the outstanding disputes, but I think both situations are analogous- Starmer's settling basically by accepting pay review body recommendations, just like Thatcher accepted Clegg. (She disbanded Clegg the next year).

I'm not the biggest William Hague fan, but he can be interesting and obviouly puts effort into his columns, He must do his nut when he sees the rubbish Bozo gets away with.

When right wing commentators hear ‘Can’t stand Starmer, wouldn’t want a pint with him, but he’s in charge, ignores the media and knows what he wants,’ does it remind them of someone?

If you want to read any of the pay to view stuff for free you just copy the free bit of the article and paste into a Word document it pastes the entire article.

Useful tip, that. Ta very much.

satnav wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 5:20 pm If you want to read any of the pay to view stuff for free you just copy the free bit of the article and paste into a Word document it pastes the entire article.

Handy, but I have to be honest - free is still a bit expensive for the Mail.

I was thinking "What caliber of IT genius do they have at the Mail"

Nothing of any surprise or originality when you do read Johnson’s column, fucking awful.

Watchman wrote: ↑Mon Sep 02, 2024 1:16 pm I was thinking "What caliber of IT genius do they have at the Mail"

Likely the same old mates that Cummings hired to organise track and trace.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... n-sea.html

Cunt talks bollocks.

When you think you can’t despise the cunt more, he exceeds your expectations

Is he seriously asking people to believe that that crossing would not have been attempted if the shite Rwanda gimmick was still in place?

Idiots coming up with obvious solutions that don't stand up to a second's thoughts but they'll still work just because. And BTL is even worse.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... itain.html

Yay for being rich, says cunt.

What would he know about actually being rich? He just spends other people's money.

Did the cunt mention that emigration exceeded half a million last year and immigration from Europe and the rest of the developed world, outside London, has virtually dried up? Probably not.

Youngian wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 11:09 am Did the cunt mention that emigration exceeded half a million last year and immigration from Europe and the rest of the developed world, outside London, has virtually dried up? Probably not.

It's incredible how things that normally take years to work out are now happening in two months.