Page 2 of 13
Re: The Sun
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 12:14 am
by davidjay
satnav wrote: ↑Wed Dec 15, 2021 10:41 pm

The Sun doesn't like it when celebs use well paid lawyers to avoid getting a prison sentence which seems a little bit rich given that the CEO of UK News Rebekah Brooks used very highly paid lawyers to avoid prison over her part in the phone hacking scandal.
Especially when it was the Sun that made them famous in the first place.
Re: The Sun
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 12:18 am
by Bones McCoy
Has the sun withdrawn her "Stunna" status?
Re: The Sun
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 6:31 am
by Cyclist
What I find interesting is that little box at top right - "Avoid the pub and save Christmas". Haven't we heard this before? March 2020: "Pubs can stay open but we recommend you don't go in them". That worked so well last time, didn't it. And it wasn't Christmas last time. They've learned nothing.
Re: The Sun
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:41 pm
by satnav
This front page from last Wednesday hasn't aged too well.

Re: The Sun
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2021 12:29 am
by mattomac
Yeah it amused me when I saw it and then remembered it the day after when she started to row back on her engagements.
Re: The Sun
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:19 am
by Youngian
Safe to say there'll be no Pulitzers for Mr Slack. This is such a shit Watergate, the Sun is the Washington Post employing Nixon's burglars
Re: The Sun
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 2:07 am
by mattomac
And to top it off they’ve gone on the attack re-reporting a 2 year old story of Starmer having a drink while with one other potentially a couple of staff.
If I’m honest it Looks like what Johnson believes his parties to be, a beer during or after a work meeting. A case load of wine and a DJ in taxpayers paid property during a lockdown it is not.
Re: The Sun
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 8:38 pm
by Youngian
“They’re all at it” is the only pot shot left to take. And blame the BBC for shit stirring.
Re: The Sun
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:05 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Re: The Sun
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:49 pm
by Youngian
Even if it is the Tories, the Sun usually piles in on a juicy government scandal. This distraction headline just looks weird, when even Aunt Beryl is furious at Bozo. Since when did Murdoch stand by a sinking ship?
Re: The Sun
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 1:27 am
by mattomac
Surprised no one posted Thursdays woeful cover that required a degree in political communication/media to kind of get it (well you would assume so but as someone who has I couldn’t tell you what the hell it was).
It involved a pie.
Re: The Sun
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 4:56 am
by Boiler
Was this to do with the MP for Melton Mowbray, the home of the pork pie?
Re: The Sun
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 4:33 pm
by Youngian
Boiler wrote: ↑Fri Jan 21, 2022 4:56 am
Was this to do with the MP for Melton Mowbray, the home of the pork pie?
It is. Even Mafia hoodlums think up more creative nick names.
Re: The Sun
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 4:35 pm
by Andy McDandy
It was "Crust Ahead" - do they mean to riff on cruising ahead (not really)? Just ahead (a generous interpretation)? Who knows?
Re: The Sun
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 4:35 pm
by Watchman
Yes, but every party I organise, I always insist on pork pies
Re: The Sun
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 3:12 am
by mattomac
Even taking into account that it had been given that nickname none of it made sense as pointed out no one was sure what “crust ahead” meant.
Re: The Sun
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 12:38 pm
by davidjay
mattomac wrote: ↑Sat Jan 22, 2022 3:12 am
Even taking into account that it had been given that nickname none of it made sense as pointed out no one was sure what “crust ahead” meant.
I saw it as a pun on 'just ahead' but why they'd use that phrase was beyond me, and presumably way, way beyond Sun readers, unless they thought "Hur hur, a pork pie, 'e's a ledg."
Re: The Sun
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 7:05 pm
by Youngian
Like the Sun’s front page, Harry would be better keeping mum about this fiasco
Re: The Sun
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2022 1:37 pm
by Watchman
Re: The Sun
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2022 9:16 pm
by mattomac
They said by getting rid of James that the future Murdochs would keep their newspapers, I doubt it.
Can make a case for the Times