Mailwatch(ed) Forum

That could work. It was a very popular policy but the renewables auctions seem to be going well anyway.

There are some civil service reforms planned. The Guardian straight in referring to them as Trumpian.

Dealing with poor performance, especially at senior level, seems like a better idea than voluntary redundancies and hiring freezes. Sometimes the people who go for voluntary redundancy are the people most confident of getting another job. And you need new people coming in.

I’ve noticed that lots of people BTL on the Guardian steam into senior civil servants when they’re up before committees as “the man”. But when it’s suggested generally that there could be a general issue there, then they don’t like that either.

Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 10:55 pm That could work. It was a very popular policy but the renewables auctions seem to be going well anyway.

There are some civil service reforms planned. The Guardian straight in referring to them as Trumpian.

Dealing with poor performance, especially at senior level, seems like a better idea than voluntary redundancies and hiring freezes. Sometimes the people who go for voluntary redundancy are the people most confident of getting another job. And you need new people coming in.

I’ve noticed that lots of people BTL on the Guardian steam into senior civil servants when they’re up before committees as “the man”. But when it’s suggested generally that there could be a general issue there, then they don’t like that either.

I've noticed a tendancy in the Guardian to label things they don't like as Trumpian. George Monbiot did an article claiming that planning reform was just like DOGE. More on GB Energy here.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... d-miliband

The UK government is reportedly weighing up the possibility of cutting planned funding for GB Energy, the state-owned company set up by Labour to drive renewable energy and cut household bills, in June’s spending review.

Cuts to the £8.3bn of taxpayer money promised over the five-year parliament would be another blow for Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, after he was overruled by the government when the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, backed the expansion of Heathrow’s third runway.

GB Energy, a vital cog in Keir Starmer’s plans to “supercharge” Britain’s clean energy revolution, was only given an initial £100m in October’s budget to cover its first two years.

Ministers are carrying out a “zero-based review” of all government spending, which has been given additional impetus after Starmer’s pledge to boost investment in defence.

Miliband wouldn’t be the only minister who might get less money than they expected. Probably happening with health too, but Starmer v Streeting isn’t quite the same psychodrama value.

I’d rather GB Energy got less if benefits couldn’t be cut.

More here on the spring statement.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9qjn879lr4o

The Treasury has blamed global economic policy and geopolitical uncertainty over the outcome of conflicts in Ukraine and Middle East, for raising government borrowing costs.

Possible other announcements that are being reported include:

Reducing the £20,000 tax-free annual limit in cash ISAs, to encourage more people to invest their savings in stocks and shares

Confirming details of how international aid funding will be reallocated to defence, following the prime minister's announcement that UK defence spending will rise to 2.5% of national income by 2027.

Government sources have been keen to state that this event is not a major one because it will not include tax rises, only spending cuts.

A debateable tax hiking policy could be announced, however, if Reeves decides to extend the freeze on the thresholds at which people start to pay different rates of income tax.

TRUMPIAN!

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... il-service

Highly controversial plans to revolutionise Whitehall by introducing performance-related pay, an accelerated exit process for under-performing mandarins and more digitalisation will be announced this week in what ministers say is a programme to “reshape the state” so it can respond to a new “era of insecurity”.

The proposed changes, to be announced by Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden, will inevitably provoke alarm and resistance from civil service unions, and be seen as the government using the current wave of global uncertainty as cover to drive through radical modernisation of civil service methods and culture.

They will also be seen as following Donald Trump’s decision to set up a Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) run by the billionaire X owner Elon Musk to reduce spending and increase performance.

Remember, journalists aren't as clever as they think they are; and assume their readers are fucking morons. They know they're spouting shit, and the fuckers are gobbling it up like chocolate.

And one of the basics is that everything must be contextualised by comparison to something recent and vaguely similar.

See also this response from this tedious fucker.

In other words what every sensible mandarin has been advocating for the past 20 years...

I sense that Trump's presence has revived the Ming Vase.

Starmer played a blinder in the week after Zelensky Friday in the White House.

He faces a narrowing tightrope ahead.
And a lot of hostiles, home and abroad, waiting to leap on the first slip.