Page 82 of 148
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 12:52 pm
by Youngian
It reminds me of the story of Chelsea players referring to Frank Lampard as the 'Professor'. because he had a few GCSE's.
Matt Le Tessier’s team mates called him a poof for reading the Guardian. Is he now their respected intellectual guru?
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 1:22 pm
by Spoonman
Youngian wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 12:52 pm
It reminds me of the story of Chelsea players referring to Frank Lampard as the 'Professor'. because he had a few GCSE's.
Matt Le Tessier’s team mates called him a poof for reading the Guardian. Is he now their respected intellectual guru?
Pretty sure that was Graham Le Saux, was it not? I can't recall Le Tessier even being referred to as some sort of intellectual during his playing days.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 2:25 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
satnav wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 11:19 am
According to Sky News presenter Sophie Ridge, Tory MPs are telling her 'that the problem with the PM is that while he may be a first class academic he is a fifth rate politician.' What does this say about the calibre of the current crop of Tory MPs if they regard Rishi as some kind of intellectual heavy weight. It reminds me of the story of Chelsea players referring to Frank Lampard as the 'Professor'. because he had a few GCSE's.
He wrote a pamphlet on freeports before they were fashionable (or rather before everyone was casting about desperately for Brexit benefits). That basically makes him Keynes in the current Tory Party.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 3:38 pm
by Andy McDandy
If he's a Keynes, it's Milton.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 3:57 pm
by davidjay
Spoonman wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 1:22 pm
Youngian wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 12:52 pm
It reminds me of the story of Chelsea players referring to Frank Lampard as the 'Professor'. because he had a few GCSE's.
Matt Le Tessier’s team mates called him a poof for reading the Guardian. Is he now their respected intellectual guru?
Pretty sure that was Graham Le Saux, was it not? I can't recall Le Tessier even being referred to as some sort of intellectual during his playing days.
Pat Nevin. Read the Guardian, liked the Cocteau Twins.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:31 pm
by Youngian
Spoonman wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 1:22 pm
Youngian wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 12:52 pm
It reminds me of the story of Chelsea players referring to Frank Lampard as the 'Professor'. because he had a few GCSE's.
Matt Le Tessier’s team mates called him a poof for reading the Guardian. Is he now their respected intellectual guru?
Pretty sure that was Graham Le Saux, was it not? I can't recall Le Tessier even being referred to as some sort of intellectual during his playing days.
Yes it was, my mistake
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2023 2:30 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
There was actually a case for changing these, because they will make building lots of extra housing harder. But I'll take the political win as partial payback for Brexit, where they told shedloads of lies about how nothing would change.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2023 3:06 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Sunak apparently deferring to Miriam Cates now. I'm no expert but I reckon Sunak ought to worry less about the crank church vote, and a bit more about "Blue Wall" Lib Dems.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2023 4:18 pm
by satnav
With Friday's storm leaving death and destruction in its wake a number of people have been asking why has Sunak not been visiting the areas worst hit by the storm. Presumably he won't becoming to Chesterfield we don't have a Tory MP. I seem to remember that Johnson was nowhere to be seen when we had serious floods shortly before the Covid pandemic.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2023 4:50 pm
by kreuzberger
Does Chesterfield have an airport? (There's your problem, right there...)
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2023 4:54 pm
by Yug
It does have open spaces large enough for helicopters to land.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2023 7:40 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Yug wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 4:54 pm
It does have open spaces large enough for helicopters to land.
If it has floats.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2023 4:28 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
- How are the polls? Surely now there's an international crisis, people are returning to the natural party of government?
- No.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:15 pm
by satnav
I see Rishi has remedied his non-appearance at any of the flooding sites by dispatching Therese Coffey to comfort the flood victims. Haven't these people suffered enough?
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:20 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
More of those long term decisions.
Goodbye, rail investment, hello more money for bus subsidies now.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:27 pm
by Boiler
I'll see that bollocks, and raise you this:
Rishi Sunak and the great HS2 ‘released funding’ con. part 4.
This morning certain national and other newspapers are uncritically rehashing a DfT press release, claiming that money released from scapping phase 2 of HS2 is going to fund new bus services next year.
This is very frustrating because those newspapers and journalists are helping the government publicise the con. Not one of the journos has stopped to think, do any analysis, or ask any awkward questions. For example, discussing the theoretical size of the slice of a non-existent pie rather than pointing out the fact the pie itself doesn’t exist. Is it any wonder people in the UK are so woefully ill-informed when members of the 4th estate become an uncritical arm of government propaganda?
Instead of having a new green railway, the modern spine of our crumbling network which is beset by Climate Change we’ll have what to show for the money? Nothing – apart from the abandoned, half built structures on HS2’s route to Crewe – a monument to Rishi Sunak and this governments short-term thinking and lies.
It’s no wonder some perceptive commentators are calling Sunak ‘Truss lite’. This is similar to her economic madness of borrowing money from the markets to fund tax cuts.
Yet again Rishi Sunak is trying to con you with ‘jam tomorrow’ – and large sections of the media are helping him to do it.
Mr. Bigland's blog is well worth reading if you're into transport matters (and railway photography).
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:44 pm
by satnav
Mark Harper also seems to be trying to claim credit for the £2 bus fare cap even though it was originally introduced by Andy Burnham and some other Labour mayors in the North.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2023 9:08 pm
by Boiler
satnav wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:44 pm
Mark Harper also seems to be trying to claim credit for the £2 bus fare cap even though it was originally introduced by Andy Burnham and some other Labour mayors in the North.
But as pointed out before, not all operators cap their fares; my local independent doesn't. Stagecoach certainly do, having used them a bit recently (including today).
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2023 5:40 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Don't normally retweet this guy, but this doesn't look good. I wouldn't call it corruption- the developer has something that's a lot more valuable than it was this time last year. Not many former prisons or air bases sitting around waiting to be converted into Spartan accomodation for asylum seekers. The real issue here is incompetence from Sunak himself who vetoed funding capacity when he was Chancellor. Go for that. Corruption makes the government look too much like evil geniuses.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2023 6:52 pm
by Boiler
Do we know if any remediation work was carried out by the developers - be it asbestos removal or even demolition?