Mailwatch(ed) Forum

Andy McDandy wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 12:37 pm Mention of Hodges seems to have turned you into Muttley, Abers. That's quite a reaction.

Careful, he bites!

“Yet his real scandal - his dishonest leadership campaign - is ignored, because the victims of that dishonesty were left-wing.”

Hey Owen, what about all us party members, that because of Corbyn’s twattery were on the wrong end of giving a steaming pile of shit an 80 seat majority

Andy McDandy wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 12:37 pm Mention of Hodges seems to have turned you into Muttley, Abers. That's quite a reaction.

Jones just gets right on my nipple-ends. The hypocritical wee shite.

Ha ha ha ha.

All the Trot Trash are out BTL on Fenton's blog, I see...

Wasn't the promise not to speak to the Sun during the leadership campaign only? He did a column for them last year any way. I'm sure interviews with the Morning Star would be better.

Tubby Isaacs wrote:Ha ha ha ha.

The paper once known as 'The Thunderer' has become so full of shite it should be called 'The Thunderbox'.

I'll stake a fiver on the pork haystack deflecting everyone of Starmer's questions back to Beergate today at PMQs.

Well the Mail’s suddenly gone very quiet on the issue

Yeh, whatever

“Look, we didn’t actually want you to offer to resign. We just wanted to call you a hypocrite. Is that too much to ask?”

Lots of people are pushing the idea that the Police Commissioner runs operations on police forces. If Starmer isn't fined, then Ric Holden will be on that one. He's currently lying that Starmer called for Johnson to resign just for being investigated.

Here's another lie.

That only works if you know your opponent’s too dim to check the pistol.

We're going to have to come up with a scale for stupidity - but is it "nought to Dorries" or "nought to Bridgen"?

Considering the news of a reinvestigation came as a surprise to Labour just before a weekend I’m glad he took three days, he needed to know the whys and whether what Labour had would be able to challenge that.

Johnson and the cabinet spent months claiming there weren’t any gatherings and if there were all rules were followed, ignoring the cake for a minute which is an excuse to make them look good and handy before the big fines arrive for say the party in the basement, they spent 3 months spinning that, with veiled source threats towards the Met, BBC, ITV and leaked Sue Gray sources that downplayed her report, only when Sue Gray evidently felt it was far worse than it looked did the Met kick in, they claim Khan put pressure on but it was good stroke of luck on the timing.

Boiler wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 5:20 pm We're going to have to come up with a scale for stupidity - but is it "nought to Dorries" or "nought to Bridgen"?

Dorries to nought.

EDIT: original post meant for Ukraine thread, can't find the means of deleting this one now.

[mod please delete]