Page 6 of 13

Re: The King

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2022 12:08 pm
by Bones McCoy
Andy McDandy wrote: Fri Dec 23, 2022 4:47 pm Liz, I suspect, may well have been frugal in private, but she sure loved the bling when on the job.

I think this is partly the palace, partly the PM. Britain means royalty and heritage and pomp and ceremony; and anyone disagreeing - whether an out and out republican or just calling for restraint - can be painted as doing the country down, unpatriotic, probably a lefty remainer who reads books and that.
As frugal as you can be with stables and 20 top flight racehorses.

Re: The King

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2022 5:24 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
That's a pretty political anti-Johnson honours list and not the usual Tory shits:

Sir Chris Bryant MP - Privileges Committee pursuing Johnson
Sir Grayson Perry - hardly a Tory...
Sir Bryan May - same
Sir Julian Lewis - Tory MP who opposed Johnson
Sir Alok Sharma MP - treated shabbily by Johnson
Tom Scholar OB - the civil servant who was fired from the treasury by Kwazi Kwarteng.
Prof Sir Michael Marmot CH who has spoken out on how policies such as austerity have affected public health.
Frank Skinner MBE - Labour supporter
Sir Ephraim Mirvis KBE - not 'one of us' of course - outspoken against Corbyn and Corbynism
Rosamund Adoo-Kissi-Debrah CBE - fought against the government to get better air quality
Helen Belcher OBE - Trans Rights campaigner
David Harewood OBE - mental health campaigner

Re: The King

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2022 10:28 pm
by satnav
Some of the papers tried to spin the political honours along the lines of 'Honours for MPs who made life awkward for Johnson in 2022'. Which seemed to be imply holding a prime minister to account for his actions was some kind of alien concept.

Re: The King

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2022 11:26 pm
by davidjay
Rachel Riley will have pissed a few off.

Re: The King

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2023 12:06 am
by Andy McDandy
Sexh Jewish goth genius Trot annoyer.

Is she married?

Re: The King

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2023 9:16 am
by Youngian
davidjay wrote: Sat Dec 31, 2022 11:26 pm Rachel Riley will have pissed a few off
Lots along these lines :lol:
Surprising lack of Dave Spart comments as to the irony of becoming a Member of the British Empire for raising awareness of genocide.

Re: The King

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2023 2:51 pm
by Bones McCoy
Andy McDandy wrote: Sun Jan 01, 2023 12:06 am Sexh Jewish goth genius Trot annoyer.

Is she married?
Definitely in a relationship with her Strictly dance partner.
Not interested enough to know the marital status.

Re: The King

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2023 4:11 pm
by Abernathy
Bones McCoy wrote: Sun Jan 01, 2023 2:51 pm
Andy McDandy wrote: Sun Jan 01, 2023 12:06 am Sexh Jewish goth genius Trot annoyer.

Is she married?
Definitely in a relationship with her Strictly dance partner.
Not interested enough to know the marital status.
She's been up the duff at least once. No indicator of marital linkage, mind.

Re: The King

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2023 4:38 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
She's been married to Pasha Kovalev since 2019. They have two children.

Google is your friend...

Re: The King

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2023 10:12 pm
by Bones McCoy
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Sun Jan 01, 2023 4:38 pm She's been married to Pasha Kovalev since 2019. They have two children.

Google is your friend...
Me?
I'm doing my best to avoid a stalkerish web-history.

Re: The King

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2023 4:01 pm
by Lardboy
One of my in-laws has been awarded a gong, and he has anti-Johnson paraphernalia on his kitchen wall.

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 9:10 am
by Rosvanian
The Guardian has somehow managed to get its hands on a copy of Harry's book. Mail Online editor incandescent. The website is currently plastered with stories cribbed directly from "the left wing Guardian" leak.

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 9:23 am
by satnav
It is really funny seeing Richard Eden the Mail's royal correspondent and Dan Wootton losing their shit because the book was leaked to the Guardian. They try and make out that they have never been the recipients of leaks from the palace.

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 9:49 am
by Andy McDandy
Just shows that Harry's comments on how it all works are pretty spot on then.

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 10:10 am
by satnav
The Sun now claim that one of their journalists has obtained a copy of the in Spain. Their journalist is currently digesting it so he will probably take 2 or 3 days if it contains any long words.

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 6:21 pm
by Watchman
My wish is that Harry goes full Jeremy Kyle, and demands a televised DNA test

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 6:49 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
I just wish he hadn't given the press this distraction, on a day when our proto-fascist government announced it was taking away the right to strike and reintroducing indentured labour...

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 11:02 pm
by The Weeping Angel
The best part is when he said he killed 25 Taliban.

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 11:04 pm
by The Weeping Angel
No this is the best part


Re: The King

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2023 5:26 am
by Youngian
I’ve already got the message despite never having seen a full interview with Harry. Time for him to wind his neck in. If you want to be a ubiquitous interviewee that doesn’t become boring you need you need a stack of amusing showbiz anecdotes. He’s no Kenneth Williams or Barry Cryer.