:sunglasses: 16.7 % :laughing: 66.7 % :cry: 16.7 %
User avatar
By Boiler
#86974
"Permanent modern digital records" :roll:

I'd love to know what makes it 'permanent', because I've had hard drives and flash memory fail on me - and as for optical media... yet just before Christmas I transferred a 56 year old audio tape to CDs for a friend. Nothing wrong with the tape, just the machine (an old Ferguson open reel machine) it was recorded on was faulty but I fixed that.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#86981
Musk has apparently posted something about free trade. Yeah, I mean, who could have guessed Trump might be entirely reliable on that score?

In other news, seems like the people sent to El Salvador mostly haven't been convicted of anything at all, and the minority who have been are almost entirely non-violent offences. Funny terrorists.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#86990
Some of these 10 are different periods in the same crisis. So coming 11th is almost flattering to Trump. If you adjust for that, he's in 6th place. Only the Wall Street Crash (1929), 1987 Crash, Great Depression, 2008 Financial Crisis and Nazi invasion of France to beat.

It's like watching a batsman make an enormous score and go past other massive scores. Just as he might pass John Edrich and Graham Gooch, Trump has already passed Covid and the Russian default.

User avatar
By Boiler
#86994
Youngian wrote: Mon Apr 07, 2025 3:00 pm Parting shots from Musk as he’s being canned by Trump? Because no one likes him.
Is it because he eats worms? (obscure musical reference there)

'sfunny, I remember that a very similar first half of that speech was made in the dystopian Terry Nation series Survivors, in which the lead character remarked that probably very few people remained alive on Earth who could make, I think, the component parts of a candle. Hopefully @The Weeping Angel will be along to correct me if I'm wrong.
By Youngian
#86996
If Starmer's soul searching on how to respond to Trump's tariff is, a tough call, the EU is in a far more complex position with different competing demands from member states.
They have the muscle to match Trump and its the only language he responds to but you deepen your own economic problems as well
Last edited by Youngian on Mon Apr 07, 2025 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By Spoonman
#87006
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Mon Apr 07, 2025 4:21 pm If you thought he was pulling numbers out of his arse before...

I read a report a couple of weeks back that Walmart were asking the Chinese manufacturers of their various tat to absorb the tariff costs and not having to foot it themselves. The Chinese politely told them to get stuffed - for once regarding Walmart the shoe was on the other foot.
By satnav
#87008
It is interesting that the first world leader to go to the White House to beg for lower tariffs will be Netanyahu. I wonder if the tariff was set at 17% so that Netanyahu can meet up with Trump and blow smoke up his arse which would then lead Trump to cut the tariff to 10%. In which case both sides will be able to claim some kind of victory and then other leaders will then start to fly over to America to beg for similar deals.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#87016
So, people who have left South Sudan (possibly because of opposition to the government there) are being sent back because that government won't do what the US says.

That's like taking Jewish refugees in 1939 and sending them back to Germany to punish the Nazis.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#87018
Can anybody explain where Trump is getting this utter bollocks that the economy of the USA has been “raped and pillaged” and treated “very very badly” by other countries that have somehow stolen the USA’s wealth ? That seems to be the biggest part of his rationale (if I might dignify the farce with that term) for his import tariffs strategy.

Is anybody in the US swallowing this guff ?
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#87020
Abernathy wrote: Mon Apr 07, 2025 7:09 pm

Is anybody in the US swallowing this guff ?
Yes. I've read their comments on Facebook and Twitterx.
By Rosvanian
#87021
Abernathy wrote: Mon Apr 07, 2025 7:09 pm Can anybody explain where Trump is getting this utter bollocks that the economy of the USA has been “raped and pillaged” and treated “very very badly” by other countries that have somehow stolen the USA’s wealth ? That seems to be the biggest part of his rationale (if I might dignify the farce with that term) for his import tariffs strategy.

Is anybody in the US swallowing this guff ?
Given that the entire Maga world view is built on resentment, victimhood and self pity, the answer to your question is surely a resounding 'yes'.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#87028
Abernathy wrote: Mon Apr 07, 2025 7:09 pm Can anybody explain where Trump is getting this utter bollocks that the economy of the USA has been “raped and pillaged” and treated “very very badly” by other countries that have somehow stolen the USA’s wealth ? That seems to be the biggest part of his rationale (if I might dignify the farce with that term) for his import tariffs strategy.

Is anybody in the US swallowing this guff ?
He thinks a trade deficit is the same thing as being ripped off. Or at least it is If it's in goods- services are never mentioned where the US has a very large surplus.

It's no more complicated than that.
  • 1
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
Labour Government 2024 - ?

I see Starmer didn't commit to keeping the […]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Can anybody explain where Trump is getting this […]

Keir Starmer

As Jim Hacker observed after being compared to Sta[…]

Fair enough.