:laughing: 75 % :poo: 25 %
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#86837
He's just trying to stop it being a foetid shithole full of snowflakes...
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#86916
Yeah, anything that isn't the latest hobby horse doesn't count. See also private school fees, inheritance on farms. There are a couple more they could do along these lines- very large law firms, for instance. But you'll run out of these after a while. Sounds like something's going to give on fiscal rules.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#86929
This isn't the Tory position at all. The Tory position is "freer trade except not with the EU". But it is the Reform position, and a massive one more generally in Labour "heartlands". I think Starmer's right to acknowledge that, and I think too that the prospects for free trade without its strongest historical advocate may be overrated- I'll believe the EU (with all the protectionist challenges in member states) filling all the gap when I see it.

But this talk is going too far.



https://bsky.app/profile/chadbourn.bsky ... 5hykv6hs2x
By Youngian
#86930
Tories and Reform are globalist libertarians. They object to politics internationalising to challenge global capital.
And neither is anyone following Trump’s actions but the opposite is happening. Even Mercusor and the EU have hammered out a deal they've been discussing for two decades. Is Starmer withdrawing the UK from CPTPP or will we become a North European national autarky with an Asia Paciifc tilt? The mind boggles.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#86931
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Sun Apr 06, 2025 3:09 pm This isn't the Tory position at all. The Tory position is "freer trade except not with the EU". But it is the Reform position, and a massive one more generally in Labour "heartlands". I think Starmer's right to acknowledge that, and I think too that the prospects for free trade without its strongest historical advocate may be overrated- I'll believe the EU (with all the protectionist challenges in member states) filling all the gap when I see it.

But this talk is going too far.



https://bsky.app/profile/chadbourn.bsky ... 5hykv6hs2x
Which part is going to far?
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#86932
"Globalisation" as a process has been flagging lately, per Anthony Painter. I think it's less than nailed on that it revives without its most powerful traditional advocate. I assume the RN in France put forward someone without Le Pen's previous (and surname) and remain at least the second force in presidential politics. I think they'll be very happy running against free trade deals with Bolivia.

Free trade is an underrated problem in Labour heartlands. Tristram Hunt wasted ages trying to tell Stoke that trade barriers with the biggest market weren't going to revive local ceramics. Starmer is using this moment to make a nod towards that. I think they went too far, but I noticed Darren Jones talking about cheap imported televisions. That might resonate a bit in Neath, where there used to be a big Hitachi factory well within the memory of most people.

In policy terms, we'll have to see what happens, but there's fiscal space for "government backs Sunderland firms by building stuff they should pay for themselves". That's happening already with carbon capture in various places with high polluting industries.

I think inferences over the EU reset are overdone. That's very much understood as helping UK exporters, so not really any sort of political problem.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#86933
The Weeping Angel wrote: Sun Apr 06, 2025 5:09 pm
Which part is going to far?
Globalisation being dead. It might be as a process, it might not. Few post-Covid would dispute that more local resilience was a good thing, but you don't want to sound like you're chucking the baby out with the bathwater.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#86934
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Sun Apr 06, 2025 5:11 pm
The Weeping Angel wrote: Sun Apr 06, 2025 5:09 pm
Which part is going to far?
Globalisation being dead. It might be as a process, it might not. Few post-Covid would dispute that more local resilience was a good thing, but you don't want to sound like you're chucking the baby out with the bathwater.
Fair enough we'll just have to see what he says tomorrow.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#86940
The Weeping Angel wrote: Sun Apr 06, 2025 5:31 pm
Fair enough we'll just have to see what he says tomorrow.
My guess is there's some stuff that's been planned for a while that's been given a slightly clumsy post Trump trade war messaging. A few years ago everyone agreed that globalisation had shattered lots of Britain and that we'd paid a very heavy price for lack of local capacity in the time of Covid. But I expect it'll be "deluded" if Starmer says.

One thing I haven't seen mentioned by anyone is carbon capture. Centred on industrial hubs, as it is so far, and as it was by Sunak, it's the government forking out to help industries in poorer regions that will get flattened by carbon taxes otherwise. You can't really get more of an industrial policy than that really. And causes no problem with fiscal rules- which Reeves changed to allow for more investment. So I wonder if we'll see more stuff like this.

It'll probably be rubbish, won't it?
  • 1
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99

An objective look at this bill would be to look at[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Musk has apparently posted something about free tr[…]

The Gender Identity Issue.

Obnoxious old bat. Asexuals deserve their day as i[…]

Over in America...

It's just toddler mentality, like the rest of[…]