Starmer made a timely and important statement on national security yesterday.
No doubt the Corbynistas will ignore it entirely to reuse the tired old Benn quote (I'll paraphrase) "If there's money for bombs then why not nurses?"
mattomac wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 8:12 pm Ah well I assume inviting Zelensky, hugging him on the steps of number 10 and all the rest isn’t as important as tweeting on the Gobbels social media platform.Bush has got high on his own supply lately, hasn't he?
But I forgot Stephen Bush new niche is foreign diplomacy.
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 8:32 pmHe accused me of wanting to cull immigrant nurses. I merely floated whether it matters if depopulation causes a corresponding decrease in the output of goods and services. Used to like his work, has he been taking Jordan Peterson pills?mattomac wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 8:12 pm Ah well I assume inviting Zelensky, hugging him on the steps of number 10 and all the rest isn’t as important as tweeting on the Gobbels social media platform.Bush has got high on his own supply lately, hasn't he?
But I forgot Stephen Bush new niche is foreign diplomacy.
mattomac wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 8:12 pm Ah well I assume inviting Zelensky, hugging him on the steps of number 10 and all the rest isn’t as important as tweeting on the Gobbels social media platform.Yeah I really fucked up last night I got swallowed up in all the drama and aloowed myself to be influenced by bluesky and twitter.
But I forgot Stephen Bush new niche is foreign diplomacy.
The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 11:02 pmYou just posted a tweet, from someone who’s usually worth listening to. Don’t worry.mattomac wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 8:12 pm Ah well I assume inviting Zelensky, hugging him on the steps of number 10 and all the rest isn’t as important as tweeting on the Gobbels social media platform.Yeah I really fucked up last night I got swallowed up in all the drama and aloowed myself to be influenced by bluesky and twitter.
But I forgot Stephen Bush new niche is foreign diplomacy.
The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 11:11 pm To a point I think when it comes to Starmer there's a tendancy amongst others to assume the worst and work from there.It's the old "It might be a lie but you can understand why people believe it" line.
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 8:01 pm In fairness to Bush, he’s standing up for Starmer v the “do like Hugh Grant in Love Actually” school of UK-US relations.Thanks to Eurosceptic Fico and Orban's vetoes, the EU couldn't operate as an independent actor even if defence was a competency.
Bluesky is awful on this stuff. I think lots of people are basically refighting Brexit in this crisis.