:laughing: 75 % :poo: 25 %
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#83861
Over £69 billion confirmed for council budgets
Final Settlement confirms over £69 billion government funding for councils, a 6.8% cash-terms increase in Core Spending Power
Same as the Tories, I don't notice any differences in my day to day life etc

This assumes all councils will raise council tax by the maximum without referendum, so it'll probably be a bit less. But positive, even if the result is that fewer things fall over.
By Youngian
#83863
I understand the purpose of a global network of staging posts when Britain was a global thalassocracy but what is the geopolitical rationale in the 21st century?
These islands aren't near the Horn of Africa and anti piracy vessels would be moored in Gulf states like Oman.
The days of needing giant golf ball listening station to monitor shipping are gone and it's one hell of a detour for a refueling station to send military planes and ships to Australia for bizarre unspecified reasons.
Of course Farage and Bozo cream their pants at a revived East of Suez strategy but even the slightly annoyed Chinese mainly found Johnson's speeches on the subject an eccentric joke.
Last edited by Youngian on Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#83873
davidjay wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2025 12:39 pm It's interesting to look at a map and see why we acquired those seemingly unimportant bits of pink. Gibraltar - control of the Med, Falklands - coaling station, Hong Kong - keeping an eye on China. Those Victorisn and earlier diplomats weren't daft.
The Med's a case in point - Gibraltar, Malta, Cyprus, Suez.

Then there's Belize, close to Panama. Singapore and Hong Kong effectively bookending south east Asia. Falklands for the Drake Passage, islands up the Atlantic, across the Pacific, Aden watching the other end of the Red Sea, and the Indian Ocean our private paddling pool.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#83909
Jonn Elledge.

https://jonn.substack.com/p/but-whats-it-for
Ministers keep talking about the need for a reset in relations with Europe – but over the weekend, home secretary Yvette Cooper dismissed the idea of youth mobility scheme as “not the right starting point”, even though it’s hard to imagine a smaller or less justifiable concession, and that without such concessions there is no reason for Brussels to give us anything. Someone in government, meanwhile, is briefing how annoyed they are that Liz Kendall is taking her sweet time finding ways to cut benefits yet further in a cost of living crisis, and a bunch of MPs whose seats are threatened by Reform are calling on the government to be noisier about how mean it’s being to immigrants. None of it is particularly edifying.

No one of any seniority seems willing to say anything in defence of the welfare state, that immigrants are people, or to express the minute possibility that Britain will be better off working with Europe than getting pushed around by Trump. They’re not making arguments in favour of duty or solidarity, or a national mission to rebuild what the Tories destroyed. All too often the pitch seems to be slightly more competent management of the rubble.

I’m far from the first to ask this, but – what do they think we elected them for, exactly?
I like Jonn but honestly I find articles so frustating. It's like you've done stuff but you aren't saying and echoing my worldview so therefore you're bad.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#83925
The Weeping Angel wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 12:29 am Jonn Elledge.


I like Jonn but honestly I find articles so frustating. It's like you've done stuff but you aren't saying and echoing my worldview so therefore you're bad.
Yeah, he's good, but the Commission suggestion was for 18-30 for 4 years. That's not trivial, particularly if there's a massive run of applications because they think the Tories will scrap it. By all means concede something like that as part of the deal.

But the idea of controlling immigration was very important to lots of voters who aren't zero net immigration fanatics. Cooper's right on this.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#83926
Yuan yi zhu was ridiculing the security concerns. If Mauritius shuts it down, they'd get sanctioned apparently. As I always say, "write that on the top of your GCSE paper". If there's a military emergency, sanctions are rather too slow a burner.

I'm sure Sunak and Truss were advised on the security implications, hence they had the same policy.
Last edited by Tubby Isaacs on Thu Feb 06, 2025 3:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#83930
Nuclear plans announced today. I think this is a good policy, but again it's a slow burner. Apparently Labour see this as a wedge issue that can stop people voting Green or Lib Dem. Trouble is that Labour's not losing votes to these parties. Politically, what you need is more stuff that encourages them to vote tactically for Labour.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#83933
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 1:41 pm The academic lawyer whose (Chinese origin) name I can't recall was ridiculing the security concerns. If Mauritius shuts it down, they'd get sanctioned apparently. As I always say, "write that on the top of your GCSE paper". If there's a military emergency, sanctions are rather too slow a burner.

I'm sure Sunak and Truss were advised on the security implications, hence they had the same policy.
Yuan yi zhu.
By mattomac
#83941
The only reason anyone really cares about Chagos is this Empire mindset. Everything I’ve read in the know seem to think it’s generally required.

The problem none of this is debated by opposing sides with some knowledge, it’s mostly debated by those who haven’t a clue where it is on a map.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#83950
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 2:18 pm Nuclear plans announced today. I think this is a good policy, but again it's a slow burner. Apparently Labour see this as a wedge issue that can stop people voting Green or Lib Dem. Trouble is that Labour's not losing votes to these parties. Politically, what you need is more stuff that encourages them to vote tactically for Labour.
They are.

  • 1
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 78
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]