:sunglasses: 25 % :laughing: 50 % :cry: 25 %
By Youngian
#83696
What a waste of time and energy.
The Canadian government decided to react with 25% tariffs on US goods with a total value of 155 billion Canadian dollars (about 102.8 billion euro). In addition, energy imported from the US, including oil, natural gas, and electricity, will be taxed at a 10% rate.
President Claudia Sheinbaum announced on X that she had instructed her economy minister to implement new tariffs to protect the country’s interests. Sheinbaum also rejected White House accusations that the Mexican government has links to criminal organisations, calling them slander and denying any possibility of US interference on Mexican soil.
President Claudia Sheinbaum announced on X that she had instructed her economy minister to implement new tariffs to protect the country’s interests. Sheinbaum also rejected White House accusations that the Mexican government has links to criminal organisations, calling them slander and denying any possibility of US interference on Mexican soil.
https://www.liberoreporter.it/2025/02/e ... um=bluesky
By Youngian
#83709
According to the Canadian High commissioner being interviewed on LBC, Trump needed the pretext of an emergency clause to make these tariffs legal under current treaty legislation. Hence the guff about Fentanyl pouring across the border. Can't even find any reference to this drug's manufacture and use in the US being made illegal.
By Rosvanian
#83714
I'm desperately trying to wean myself off doomscrolling but....I can't help notice that almost every one on the right loves Trump's tariff trade war and are willing him on to destroy the economies of Canada, Mexico and the EU. At the same time they're gleefully putting the boot into Britain as an irrelevence. With patriots like these, who needs enemies. It's all thoroughly depressing.
By Youngian
#83721
Rosvanian wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2025 12:16 pm At the same time they're gleefully putting the boot into Britain as an irrelevence. With patriots like these, who needs enemies.
If you're reaching a conclusion at odds with blind patriotism that's no bad thing. Having nothing to offer may play in the UK's favour while Trump fries bigger fish. He has little interest in cultivating a reliable defence and security partner in Europe but no major beef with the UK either. Perhaps he'll impose tariffs if a Scottish council turns down a planning application for a new golf course.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#83724
While I get that there must be a certain amount of head in sand going on in Whitehall, along with ideas that if anyone can act as a safety brake, it's us, coupled to pipe dreams of trade deals and NATO; there has to come a point where the UK government has to decide.

If we go with the USA against the rest of the civilised world, I frankly don't care which party's in power. It won't matter.
By Oboogie
#83732
Andy McDandy wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2025 2:22 pm While I get that there must be a certain amount of head in sand going on in Whitehall, along with ideas that if anyone can act as a safety brake, it's us, coupled to pipe dreams of trade deals and NATO; there has to come a point where the UK government has to decide.

If we go with the USA against the rest of the civilised world, I frankly don't care which party's in power. It won't matter.
What would you like the UK government to do?
By RedSparrows
#83750
The seals are already clapping that Trump's extortion is Working and is Unreal and So Winning.

Mexico are apparently sending police/guard to the border cos Daddy Trump waved his big stick.

Because before there were none! ???! Right guys???

And the tariffs are off for a month (but they were supposed to fix XYZ as well and represented a just strike against trade imbalances and)

Uh
So much winning!

And so on.

It's an absolute circus.
  • 1
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 32

Believe me when I say that I understand what you[…]

The BBC

Richard Osman has got away with voicing lefty op[…]

The Guardian

Is Adrian Chiles even writing his own column, A[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

I thought the MSM wanted Starmer because he was a […]