:sunglasses: 100 %
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#77698
Well at least Rowling isn’t even pretending any more so it’s easy for people to see where she stands.

Not so long ago people would have said much the same thing about gay men using men’s toilets in case there were children present (with the obvious and tired old inference that homosexuality = guaranteed pervert). It’s funny how it’s always the ones screaming “won’t somebody think of the children” who are absolutely *obsessed* with inspecting other people’s genitals and concerning themselves with how they use a lavatory.
By davidjay
#77719
Crabcakes wrote: Wed Oct 16, 2024 3:23 pm Well at least Rowling isn’t even pretending any more so it’s easy for people to see where she stands.

Not so long ago people would have said much the same thing about gay men using men’s toilets in case there were children present (with the obvious and tired old inference that homosexuality = guaranteed pervert). It’s funny how it’s always the ones screaming “won’t somebody think of the children” who are absolutely *obsessed* with inspecting other people’s genitals and concerning themselves with how they use a lavatory.
There seems a connection here with another ism. You can't be seen to be racist so you concentrate your bigotry on Muslims. Ditto gays and trans.
By Philip Marlow
#78042
Crabcakes wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 5:26 pm No one should be doing this to anyone, let alone someone from a community known for being the targets of some serious hate.

If he keeps this up he is going to get someone badly beaten and quite possibly killed.
It’s pretty banal to observe that how people are online doesn’t necessarily match how they behave out in the world, so it’s a genuine shock to see a video of him shouting the same weird slurs he employs on Twitter at an actual person stood next to him.

A while back, when was going on about trans women using the women’s bogs and how if he ever saw that happening he’d certainly know what to do about it, someone on another forum predicted that he was going to end up getting his collar felt for assault. It struck me as alarmist at the time but I’m beginning to wonder.
Last edited by Philip Marlow on Thu Oct 24, 2024 7:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By kreuzberger
#78048
Trans relationships are of little value and not like real ones.

In other news, a trans mate of ours left hospital today after donating one of his kidneys to his wife. Both are in fine fettle.

The kidnologist reckoned it one of the finest specimens they have ever seen.
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#78067
Philip Marlow wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 5:40 pm There’s a grim synchronicity in this appointment being announced not long after Monbiot’s article on the mistreatment of ME patients was published.
I have some arm’s length awareness of Wessely in a work capacity. Or rather, his professional actions when faced with evidence that contradicts his conclusions.

Let’s just say he does not take criticism well. And that an early retirement would be a marvellous idea.
Philip Marlow liked this
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#79835
Rowling has decided another award-winning non-white athlete who has come from a life of poverty to be top of their profession must obviously be either secretly trans or gender abnormal, and has made her anger about the gall of this woman daring to exist while not conforming to her ideals known to her followers on Musk’s bigotry-amplifying hate site.

As said elsewhere, when someone shows you who they are, believe them.

https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foo ... 55208.html

(And in case it gets raised, an explanation of the issue with the test she was withdrawn from, which even the Indy misreports somewhat)

https://apnews.com/article/zambia-banda ... acfdd2fbec
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#82039
I get that gender-critical is a protected characteristic, but this is a socially liberal political party. They're not allowed to say "this person doesn't share our values"?
Lib Dems ordered to pay £14,000 in damages to former candidate claiming discrimination over gender-critical views
The Liberal Democrats have been ordered to pay £14,000 in damages to a former parliamentary candidate who feels she was driven out of the party and barred from standing as an MP in a row over her gender-critical views, PA Media reports.
By Bones McCoy
#82113
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2025 6:02 pm I get that gender-critical is a protected characteristic, but this is a socially liberal political party. They're not allowed to say "this person doesn't share our values"?
Lib Dems ordered to pay £14,000 in damages to former candidate claiming discrimination over gender-critical views
The Liberal Democrats have been ordered to pay £14,000 in damages to a former parliamentary candidate who feels she was driven out of the party and barred from standing as an MP in a row over her gender-critical views, PA Media reports.
If true, and "barred from standing as an MP" suggests we aren't getting the whole story.
It would me most peculiar.
Imagine a situation where political parties could not ensure their candidates shared their values.

But "barred from standing as an MP" (You have to get elected first), is crying out for Homer Simpson clarifying...

"Barred from standing as a Lib Dem MP"
  • 1
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 29
Labour Government 2024 - ?

It's a blow for Rachel Reeves. Everythin[…]

Reform Party

Bad news a poll has Reform on course to win in R[…]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-14495[…]

The Guardian

Is Adrian Chiles even writing his own column, AC […]