:sunglasses: 16.7 % :laughing: 50 % :cry: 16.7 % :poo: 16.7 %
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#80213
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:47 pm
The Weeping Angel wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:27 pm Then there's nonsense like this.
I thought everyone agreed that it was bad when part of the budget was pre-briefed. Now the problem is that they didn't pre brief something in the budget?

This idea that a 1.2p rise in employers NI is causing unprecedented carnage is pretty implausible to me. The last government increased employers and employee NI and that got written up as clever parking tanks on Labour's lawn.
Someone made that point but she said it didn't count because the last one was temporary or something.
User avatar
By NevTheSweeper
#80334
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Sat Nov 30, 2024 4:37 pm
NevTheSweeper wrote: Sat Nov 30, 2024 3:57 pm
The Weeping Angel wrote: Sat Nov 30, 2024 11:40 am By the way Nev since you applied to be a canidate FOUR times, what were the reasons given?
I was turned down on three occasions without an interview. On the fourth, I narrowly lost out on selection for a paper candidate.
I call bollocks on that. You don't run selections for paper candidates.
They did in my case.
User avatar
By NevTheSweeper
#80336
davidjay wrote: Sat Nov 30, 2024 10:26 pm
NevTheSweeper wrote: Sat Nov 30, 2024 3:57 pm
The Weeping Angel wrote: Sat Nov 30, 2024 11:40 am By the way Nev since you applied to be a canidate FOUR times, what were the reasons given?
I was turned down on three occasions without an interview. On the fourth, I narrowly lost out on selection for a paper candidate.
For which party?
The Lib Dems. I was a Labour supporter in my youth, then I became a communist in the mid-nineties.

I joined the Lib Dems in 2003, because they were the opposition to Labour on my local council. Hence the selections. There was competition for selection for winnable seats.

In hindsight, the local party were right not to put me forward, even as a paper candidate.
User avatar
By NevTheSweeper
#80339
Oboogie wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:06 pm
NevTheSweeper wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 7:45 pm The Labour government's agenda: here is what they have done so far....
https://bylinetimes.com/2024/12/03/gove ... ed-so-far/
Which of those reforms are you objecting to?
No plans to reverse WFA cut
No to electoral reform
No renationalisation of public utilities
Too much tinkering at the edges instead of putting a transformative vision to improving civil society
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#80341
Why would they reverse the WFA cut when they're committed to the triple lock? The Opposition aren't committed to it either.

I support PR, but it was ruled out and the election. And I'm wondering why Starmer's getting pressed on it all the time when the previous leader never was. See also trans rights. Starmer hasn't been very good, but I don't recall Jez being bombarded with questions about trans people on hospital wards, even though he had basically the same position (ie supported the principles of the Equality Act, which allows for single sex wards where they're considered reasonable).

Weren't you moaning about the budget reaction the other day? You now think they should be committed billions more to buy back energy companies? Where are they going to get cheaper gas from anyway? What difference would it make?
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#80344
The new approach on the crime of stalking may seem second division, but it's key and very important.
  • 1
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 106
Trump 2.0 Lunacy

"Mentally insane" there is genui[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

I think Labour are mistaken if they think they can[…]

Conservatives Generally

Robert Jenrick here, running for election in Alaba[…]

Nargle Fargle

Scapegoats will be lined up by these Tory reject[…]