:cry: 100 %
User avatar
By Abernathy
#77846
I still have my copy of Fritz Spiegl’s wonderful “Keep Taking the Tabloids”, an invaluable guide to the peculiar language used by the red tops and fascist tabloids posing as respectable (Mail, Express). You can currently pick up a pre-loved copy from Amazon for less than three quid.

I’ve fallen to wondering about how tabloid-speak manifests itself in the on-line age in which we find ourselves in the 21st century, with all of the popular tabloids now giving great attention to their online presence.

Reach websites, of course, are fucking awful in terms of both content and usability, but what of the others ? The Mail’s “sidebar of shame” for instance, that does so much to make it the most visited online newspaper site in the world (I think).

One example ? Nobody ever just says anything any more. No, they “open up”, or “break their silence” (what silence?). Over to the teams .
Attachments
IMG_0091.jpeg
IMG_0091.jpeg (136.06 KiB) Viewed 15990 times
Samanfur liked this
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#77866
Similarly, "crooner", or "funnyman" (in the case of comedians).

There's a theory that it's born of the innate snobbery of journalists and the grating frustration that they will never be particularly remembered (and if they are, chances are not fondly). Therefore reduce everyone to the level of "paid to goon about and be silly".

The Mirror had a habit of referring to David Bowie as "the Ch-ch-ch-changes singer".

Anyway, a few:

"Tributes poured in", often spotted close to "Celebrities took to X, formerly known as Twitter...", when someone famous dies. I've always wondered where these tributes pour into - I could understand people sending messages to the family of the deceased, or their agent. Even to a news agency at a push. But they don't. People just go online and say stuff.

The standard photo. It seems to be the law that any story about the workplace has to be accompanied by a picture of Ricky Gervais as David Brent, a sort of shorthand for "toxic workplace/bad boss". Ditto Fawlty Towers as the standard for bad holidays. For several years, the Express would always accompany any story about terrorism with the same file photo of Osama, with the caption "TERROR: Bin Laden", just in case you might spot him wandering around the precinct.

Being told what to think. By this I don't mean the use of persuasive language or arguments. I mean the fucking sledgehammer approach taken when dealing with kids, killers, and especially killers of kids. Brave Tots, So Sad, Evil Murderer etc. Killers writing from prison always whinge in scrawled notes, even if they're writing comedy gold in copperplate handwriting. They're Beasts, clearly a different breed to Lags, who are people who have just carried out understandable crimes against adults or property. It's just unnecessary. Do we really need to be told that a guy who rapes and murders kids is evil?
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#77868
May I recommend, for those who haven't read it, Romps, Tots and Boffins: The Strange Language of News, by Robert Hutton

Pre-cyber but good.
Andy McDandy, Samanfur liked this
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#77869
May I also quote Roger McGough:

We've had our clichés framed,
And hung upon the wall,
So now for conversation
We don't have to speak at all.
By Youngian
#77872
Killer Whale wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2024 8:55 am One lazy tabloid cliche that winds me up much more than it should is describing musicians as 'the [name of hit] singer'.
Will AI lead to more hits for Elvis? Sources at the estate of the Heartbreak Hotel singer...
Etc.

Stop it.
Even worse is slotting a +50 year old hit in the headline; 'Mick can get no satisfaction' 'She loves you, Paul.' Just fuck off.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#77900
“Gemma Collins and her husband, Humphrey Bumphrey, share two children together.”


Share? What - she has them Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays, and he has them the rest of the week?
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#77901
It's the redundancy of 'share ... together' that gets my pants in a twist.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#77911
The Onion once nailed that with "Dan 'Ghostbusters' Aykroyd adopts film title as middle name". Following the example set by Jamie Halloween Lee Trading Places Curtis.

Also, the "[franchise] actor" thing means that a lot of the time they'll be linked to their most high profile or recent roles. Maggie Smith being a great recent example. Downton and Potter, that was it.
User avatar
By Watchman
#77951
Or, as Littlejohn likes to reminds us; “…..starred in that memorable episode of Minder”
User avatar
By Abernathy
#80690
There’s an increasingly irritating phrase being used in online “reporting” (I use the term loosely) , which is “opened up”. Typically : “Sir Elton John has ‘opened up’ about his use of cannabis”.

In essence, of course, it just means “has said something”. It’s becoming deeply, deeply tedious.
By Bones McCoy
#80695
soulboy wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2024 10:58 pm Ten years in Corrie.

Recurring character roles on Brookside, Hollyoaks, and The Bill.

Rock climber #3 in an episode of Casualty.
BBC Star in Hookers and Blow Scandal
I wasted 10 minutes searching for BBC Drama "Hookers and Blow Scandal"
By davidjay
#80715
Abernathy wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2024 9:28 am There’s an increasingly irritating phrase being used in online “reporting” (I use the term loosely) , which is “opened up”. Typically : “Sir Elton John has ‘opened up’ about his use of cannabis”.

In essence, of course, it just means “has said something”. It’s becoming deeply, deeply tedious.
"We reached out to" - "We asked their manager".
Reform Party

Classy and competent operation right there.

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

He's fucked off to one of his golf courses,[…]

The Liberal Democrats, generally

Davey's going to sing this isn't he? ht[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

I've seen the figure of 1% of trade volumes,[…]