By Philip Marlow
#77068
It’s not like I cancelled my subscription over it, but since The Tower I’ve found it difficult to read O’Hagan’s stuff. The online version has added corrections now, but having read it again as a precursor to Butler’s piece it seems to me to be founded on a handful of rotten premises which render the thing unsalvageable. And that’s before you get to the tone deaf arrogance of his responses to criticism. Since he’s probably not going to apologise for all he got wrong, it’s good to have a corrective.
By Youngian
#77136
Philip Marlow wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2024 2:01 pm It’s not like I cancelled my subscription over it, but since The Tower I’ve found it difficult to read O’Hagan’s stuff. The online version has added corrections now, but having read it again as a precursor to Butler’s piece it seems to me to be founded on a handful of rotten premises which render the thing unsalvageable. And that’s before you get to the tone deaf arrogance of his responses to criticism. Since he’s probably not going to apologise for all he got wrong, it’s good to have a corrective.
Give us a synopsis as to why Andy O'Hagan's views on Grenfield as so bad. Is he an ultra deregulation libertarian?
Conservatives Generally

Ha ha ha ha. Tories claim No 10 admission UK won[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

'Kinell, Trump has managed to get those three[…]

Maintenant en France

The law is the law in France. In Türkiye, it […]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

I know a lot of EV owners are pretty cross at hav[…]