:laughing: 100 %
User avatar
By Abernathy
#52685
Might be worth giving Russell Brand his own thread, particularly since C4 Dispatches is about to run a major expose of some "very serious allegations" of abuse against him .

Brand is a strange character. I never found him remotely funny as a comedian - more deeply, deeply tedious, rather- and in recent years he has re-invented himself as some sort of conspiracy theory espousing crank. Still desperately tedious.


So is he the Alex Jones de nos jours, or the Rolf Harris de nos jours??
Or perhaps both ?

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/russell-bran ... 3FAaKNvaUo
These allegations pertain to the time when I was working in the mainstream, when I was in the newspapers all the time, when I was in the movies. And as I've written about extensively in my books, I was very, very promiscuous.
"Now, during that time of promiscuity, the relationships I had were absolutely always consensual. I was always transparent about that then, almost too transparent, and I'm being transparent about it now as well.

"And to see that transparency metastasised into something criminal that I absolutely deny makes me question, is there another agenda at play
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#52687
Blatant wrong 'un.
By satnav
#52694
Many of supporters are trying to claim that he is being targeted because of his views on vaccines, the only problem with this particular claim is that the investigation started over 3 years ago where as the first vaccine wasn't administered until December 2020. His supporters are clearly not very at good at Maths.
Oboogie liked this
By Bones McCoy
#52699
Bones McCoy wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 3:01 pm Kirsty Gallagher and Elon Musk have found him not guilty.

A presumption of innocence is wired into our legal system, but that doesn't equate to freedom form investigation.
Also Andrew Tate (With friends like .....).
RandomElement liked this
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#52705
He made a statement in which he said that yes, he had been very promiscuous but it had all been consensual.

Draw your own conclusions.
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#52707
User avatar
By Spoonman
#52709
Given that Brand has seemingly sought to get his defence in first, with every lunatic fringe & right wing grifter seemingly backing him up, they'll be a large amount of egg on his face if Dispatches doesn't even mention him once tonight and as a result outed himself as a <censored>!
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#52715
It's his anti-vaxx insanity.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 10
Trump 2.0 Lunacy

What can you do with this stuff? Ignore and try […]

Reform Party

I was thinking Wanksy for West of England, assumin[…]

Nimbies

https://twitter.com/rcolvile/status/190737911973[…]

He got away with laughing that off, didn't he[…]