:sunglasses: 57.1 % :pray: 4.8 % :laughing: 28.6 % :poo: 9.5 %
User avatar
By Yug
#44575
This leads me to believe that for the last 40 years people haven't been voting for Jeremy Corbyn, but for the Labour candidate. Who just happened to be Jeremy Corbyn.

I was worried that if Corbyn stood as an independent, or for Garglewax's Respeck party, or whatever, Labour might have had a struggle to win. But nah. Apparently it never was about Corbyn. I wonder how his ego is feeling right now? :lol:
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#44587
Those attending the meeting weren't members, they were delegates; this wasn't an all-members meeting. >cough<

There are approximately 100 delegates (from branches, unions, sections etc.) so almost half didn't go.

I wonder if they had notice of the meeting?
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#44613
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Thu May 18, 2023 4:38 pm McDonnell is now sticking it to Sir Keir on the Green Belt. Working class people apparently regularly head out there to… what? Stare at some shitty scrubland?
Hunt squirrels to eat with rudimentary bows and traps.

Oh wait, sorry - that was The Hunger Games.
By Youngian
#44619
Don’t know what Keir’s plans are but it’ll be best left to district councils to decide for themselves if liberalisation is appropriate. Cambridgeshire for instance has vastly differing economic geography, Cambridge has made great strides to accommodate expansion but there’s little appetite for urban sprawl. Neighbouring Isle of Ely meanwhile now has a population of commuters and farmers. As a consequence they’re extremely accommodating and creative with rural planning applications if you have a business idea (a hobby business will tick a box). Lib Dem councillors are especially keen on rural constituents who aren’t just tricky farmers.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#44632
Jez's former speech writer is on Starmer's case too.

He's discovered land banking, which even if we accept should be zero (which it shouldn't, because firms need to be confident of a steady stream of places to build on) you'd still be short of what was needed. Where do the rest of the homes go, Steve? When councils do things like stick a load of new homes on estate land, people like you moan about gentrification.

User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#44638
Local party members, not a selection of delegates to what doesn't sound at all like a regular meeting.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#44639
Here's the nonsense Howell and McDonnell are defending. Look at the size of that green belt around Oxford. Funnily enough, the average property price is £585,000.

If we built more on that, we could maybe not use all that land owned by developers for housing. How about we stick some parks on there instead? Wouldn't the local kids be better served by that than being told to walk a miles to the green bit?

Image
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#44641
There used to be requirements for shops, schools, clinics, and recreational spaces in New builds. Plus a thing called Percentage for Art, to encourage a little character on otherwise soulless estates.

Not that long ago, either. All went post-2010. To be fair, they regularly were ignored, because just like affordable housing penalties, developers could easily make the money back by stuffing in another McMansion or two. But the intent was there.
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#44883
Commemorating? Dunno what she’s reading, but I’ve not seen anything even remotely approaching apologetic, let alone celebratory.

Also: next up on The Canary’s non-sequitur of the year - the Tesco meal deal is now £5 and people are complaining, but did they complain when Jeremy Corbyn spent a whole afternoon interviewing half of UB40 when they endorsed him for Labour leader? No - which is evidence people wanted his socialist policies and hate Keir Starmer. Click “donate £50” to find out more!
  • 1
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 91
Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Isn't there a bit of a shadow hanging ove[…]

Labour, generally.

Back in 2021 I did some phonebanking for Dan Norri[…]

Russell Brand

In his latest video Brand says. “I’ve[…]

Trot Watch

I think that is an undeserved slur.