:sunglasses: 38.5 % :pray: 2.6 % :laughing: 30.8 % 🧥 7.7 % :cry: 7.7 % :🤗 2.6 % :poo: 10.3 %
User avatar
By Watchman
#25538
“Yet his real scandal - his dishonest leadership campaign - is ignored, because the victims of that dishonesty were left-wing.”

Hey Owen, what about all us party members, that because of Corbyn’s twattery were on the wrong end of giving a steaming pile of shit an 80 seat majority
User avatar
By Abernathy
#25539
Andy McDandy wrote: Tue May 10, 2022 12:37 pm Mention of Hodges seems to have turned you into Muttley, Abers. That's quite a reaction.
Jones just gets right on my nipple-ends. The hypocritical wee shite.
Oboogie liked this
By mattomac
#25606
Considering the news of a reinvestigation came as a surprise to Labour just before a weekend I’m glad he took three days, he needed to know the whys and whether what Labour had would be able to challenge that.

Johnson and the cabinet spent months claiming there weren’t any gatherings and if there were all rules were followed, ignoring the cake for a minute which is an excuse to make them look good and handy before the big fines arrive for say the party in the basement, they spent 3 months spinning that, with veiled source threats towards the Met, BBC, ITV and leaked Sue Gray sources that downplayed her report, only when Sue Gray evidently felt it was far worse than it looked did the Met kick in, they claim Khan put pressure on but it was good stroke of luck on the timing.
Tubby Isaacs liked this
By MisterMuncher
#25621
Boiler wrote: Wed May 11, 2022 5:20 pm We're going to have to come up with a scale for stupidity - but is it "nought to Dorries" or "nought to Bridgen"?
Dorries to nought.
  • 1
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 152
Pick Your Own Pope

I don't think that this is a pivotal moment f[…]

Over in America...

https://twitter.com/ScottWRasmussen/status/1914349[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

https://twitter.com/ok_post_guy/status/19144327270[…]

Conservatives Generally

https://scontent.fedi1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30[…]