:sunglasses: 23.1 % :pray: 7.7 % :laughing: 69.2 %
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#19590
I don't believe you understand 20th century European history and Russian foreign policy imperatives.

And East Germany pretty much counts as it went from Russian to NATO alignment...
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#19595
Malcolm I do understand 20th European Century. In 1956 the Soviet Union and other Warsaw Pact sent troops into Hungary to put down an uprising and remove it's leadership, in 1968 they did the same thing to Czechoslovakia and in Poland well let's consider the list shall we

1. The Nazi-Soviet Pact

2. The Invasion of Eastern Poland and the subsequent terror that involved

3. The Katyn Forest Massacre

4. Allowing the Nazis to crush the Warsaw uprising

5. Imposing a communist government on Poland without the consent of the Polish people

As for Russian foreign policy imperatives well their clear they regard Eastern Europe as within their sphere of influence and they don't like the idea of nations within their sphere of influence acting independent like becoming Democracies or joining the EU or joining NATO. As for East Germany well here's what a former ambassador has to say on the subject.

https://www.friendsofeurope.org/insight ... largement/
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#19596
No, you don't understand.

There are unchanging imperatives to Russian foreign policy:

a) Access to warm-water harbours (ie the Baltic States)
b) A buffer zone to prevent invasion across the North European plain to prevent invasion.

These go back to Tsarist policies, and were in effect during and after WW1.

You tend to see things in rather depressingly shallow terms. Try looking at Russia's actions in the light of a and b above, and you will see that the imperatives have not changed, and Putin is essentially pursuing Tsarist objectives.
By RedSparrows
#19611
There's also a kultura aspect to it. Ukraine is Slav. Russia is Slav. What's the difference, drozya?

Putin has called parts of Ukraine 'Novorossiya', even, as I think I reference elsewhere on this forum.
By MisterMuncher
#20192
By blaming the lazy and feckless benefit scroungers, of course. Possibly making rumbles about sending in the army.
Amazonian liked this
User avatar
By Cyclist
#20801
I hope those figures are forwarded to Dorries. It would appear that in spite of everything she believes, people are still turning to the BBC for news they can trust.

Nice to see Planey MacPlaneface got six times the number of viewers than the silent majority channel. :lol:
  • 1
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 99
Labour Government 2024 - ?

Whatever is in the deal, Ed "Mad Dog&[…]

Kemi Badenoch

Nothing says "I'm definitely right a[…]

Pick Your Own Pope

Isn’t it weird that I’ve seen illusion[…]

Guardian

Agreed - it looks shite on my laptop.